2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

X- factor: A modified relaxation factor to accelerate the convergence rate of the radiative transfer equation with high-order resolution schemes using the Normalized Weighting-Factor method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial guessed intensity field is zero, it is used for all configurations and the STEP scheme is used in the first iteration. Equation ( 17) (Xam an et al, 2018a(Xam an et al, , 2018b expresses the relative improvements on CPU time for the numerical solution between the DC procedure and DC Evolutive that apply (1 þ 1)-ES-RTE optimization.…”
Section: Study Cases Experimental Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The initial guessed intensity field is zero, it is used for all configurations and the STEP scheme is used in the first iteration. Equation ( 17) (Xam an et al, 2018a(Xam an et al, , 2018b expresses the relative improvements on CPU time for the numerical solution between the DC procedure and DC Evolutive that apply (1 þ 1)-ES-RTE optimization.…”
Section: Study Cases Experimental Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results showed that the parallel method converged 35 times more than a sequential methodology. Xam an et al (2018aXam an et al ( , 2018b implemented the NWF EC 38,6 method to reduce the CPU time in the numerical solution of the radiative transfer equation (RTE) using HO and HR schemes. Results showed that modified relaxation factors using NWF and DC procedures reduce the computational cost by 219% and 75.4%, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach reduces the computational time up to 85% with a maximum error of less than 2%. In references [8,9], the convergence rate to solve a radiative transfer equation with several high-order and high-resolution schemes, applying the normalized weighting-factor method (WFM), is evaluated. In reference [8], the WFM convergence time is compared with that obtained by a deferred correction (DC) technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reference [9], the X-factor method is compared, in terms of computer time needed to obtain a converged solution, with the widely used deferred-correction (DC) method for calculating a two-dimensional cavity with emitting-absorbing-scattering gray media using the discrete ordinates method. A time reduction rate of up to 211%, 181% and 219% is obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%