1977
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.15.943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

L-subshell ionization of Au, Tl, Pb, Bi, Th, and U by protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most publications dealing with L-shell excitation investigate the direct ionization process by means of light particle bombardment. The comparison of recent experimental results -p and 4He bombardment of Ag, Ta and Au [15][16][17][18][19][20] -with PWBA model [21] calculations, including binding and Coulomb deflection corrections PWBA(BC) [5], shows a satisfactory agreement for incidence energies of about 1-5 MeV/amu. At lower energies, however, we found the PWBA(BC) theory to underestimate the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most publications dealing with L-shell excitation investigate the direct ionization process by means of light particle bombardment. The comparison of recent experimental results -p and 4He bombardment of Ag, Ta and Au [15][16][17][18][19][20] -with PWBA model [21] calculations, including binding and Coulomb deflection corrections PWBA(BC) [5], shows a satisfactory agreement for incidence energies of about 1-5 MeV/amu. At lower energies, however, we found the PWBA(BC) theory to underestimate the experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…At the thin target measurements the main sources of error consist in a 10% efficiency uncertainty of the X-ray detector used as well as 5-8 % target inhomogenities important in the case of N and Ne impact. The accuracy of the X-ray cross sections observed from thick target yields is mainly limited by the average uncertainties of the stopping power data [29] 6 3.91(+2) 10 2.26(+3) 13 5.39(+3) 16 9.77(+3) 20 1.31 (+4) 6 1.00 10 1.20(+1) 13 3.50(+l) 16 8.80(+l) 20 1.83(+2) a 1.20(+1)=1.20.10 +1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results, as well as the few existing data from other laboratories (Barros Leite et al 1977, Budnar et al 1984, Amirabadi et al 1997, are compared with the theoretical predictions by plotting the ratios between the experimental (σ exp ) and the predicted (σ th ) cross sections versus the relativistic reduced velocity parameter ξ R L . Data reported on production cross sections (Amirabadi et al 1997) have been converted to ionization cross sections by making use of the same procedure and the same parameters used for our own data, in order to compare with the other data treated in the same way.…”
Section: Cross Section Valuesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, in a review by Jitschin (1990), no clear evidence about the better basis came out. Thus we prefer to adopt the Krause's basis, that has been more widely used, and, in particular, has been used by two of the three authors who have reported data on these elements (Budnar et al 1984, Barros Leite et al 1977.…”
Section: Ionization Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation