2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.66.097502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SU(N)gauge theories in2+1dimensions: Further results

Abstract: We calculate the string tension and part of the mass spectrum of SU(4) and SU(6) gauge theories in 2+1 dimensions using lattice techniques. We combine these new results with older results for N c = 2, ..., 5 so as to obtain more accurate extrapolations to N c = ∞. The qualitative conclusions of the earlier work are unchanged: SU(N c ) theories in 2+1 dimensions are linearly confining as N c → ∞; the limit is achieved by keeping g 2 N c fixed; SU(3), and even SU(2), are 'close' to SU(∞). We obtain more convinci… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
93
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
14
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and Table IV of Ref. [48]. This gives √ σ = 0.506(5), implying a lattice spacing a = 0.227(2) fm, i.e.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 and Table IV of Ref. [48]. This gives √ σ = 0.506(5), implying a lattice spacing a = 0.227(2) fm, i.e.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These expectations are largely based on an analysis of all-orders perturbation theory, so it is interesting to ask how precisely they are confirmed by non-perturbative lattice calculations. This question has been addressed in the past [53,59,60], but here we can go somewhat further using the very precise string tensions calculated for N ∈ [2,8] in [22]. We display in figure 1 the continuum values of √ σ/g 2 N taken from the first row of table 2 in [22].…”
Section: Large-n Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In actual fact the correction is so small that its particular form is not important to the extracted value of a 2 σ.) The mass gap comes from [53,59,60] and the critical length from calculations of the D = 2 + 1 deconfining temperature in [10][11][12][13]. In table 6 we do the same for the SU(2) and SU(4) calculations that are dedicated to calculating the ground state.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact our calculations are accurate enough to confirm the presence of the additional zero-point energy, as discussed in Section 4.2 and displayed in Fig.4. Indeed we saw that in any non-stringy attempt to describe these spectra, the particle excitation carrying the non-zero momentum will have a mass that is constrained by our calculated spectrum to be very much smaller than the known mass gap of the bulk space-time theory [23,24]. Thus such a (presumably massless) excitation must exist on the flux tube rather than in the bulk, and will thus arise from an effective string action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly speaking this tells us that m 2 /σ 2a 0.1 (1). This is to be compared to the known value of the mass gap in the SU(6) gauge theory [23,24] which is m 2 G /σ 2a ∼ 13. Thus this 'particle' cannot be an excitation in the bulk space-time, and must be an excitation that lives on the flux tube.…”
Section: K=2a 2smentioning
confidence: 99%