1968
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.167.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Si28(d, He3

Abstract: The level structure of 27 A1 from 0-to 6.5-MeV excitation has been studied with the 28 Si (i, 3 He) 27 Al reaction at £d=34.4 MeV. Eight experimental angular distributions are presented. Assignments of / values and spectroscopic factors are made with a local, zero-range distorted-wave Born-approximation analysis. The deduced I values are consistent with the known spins of levels of 27 A1 of excitation energy < 3.0 MeV. Levels at 4.05-and 5.15-MeV excitation are assigned 1=1, and the level at 4.40-MeV excitatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The E-18 potential gives S values smaller by a factor of 2.75. Only the former values are in agreement with those obtained from a study [10] of the 28Si(d, 3He)ZVA1 reaction (S=3.8 and 0.49) or predicted from shell-model calculations [9] (S= 3.5 and 0.55). Again the surface-transparent E-18 potential is unacceptable at 352 MeV.…”
Section: The Criteria and An Examplesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The E-18 potential gives S values smaller by a factor of 2.75. Only the former values are in agreement with those obtained from a study [10] of the 28Si(d, 3He)ZVA1 reaction (S=3.8 and 0.49) or predicted from shell-model calculations [9] (S= 3.5 and 0.55). Again the surface-transparent E-18 potential is unacceptable at 352 MeV.…”
Section: The Criteria and An Examplesupporting
confidence: 85%
“…If we assume the 3.07-MeV state to be §+, then the ldz/2 and 2si/ 2 shells have approximately equal populations, the same as is observed for Si 28 as shown in columns 4 and 5 of Table V. The upper ld 3 / 2 limit shown in column 5 must be treated with reserve as Wildenthal and Newman 19 were unable to resolve the f + state at 2.976 MeV in AF from a |+ state at 3.001 MeV. Their spectroscopic factor was extracted after fitting a combination of 1=2+4 to the observed doublet distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The distorted waves were generated with the use of a Woods-Saxon well either with or without an Independent imaginary part, 7 where L is the partial-wave quantum number, i.e., by a potential of the form…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%