<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>980</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math>-Resonance Production in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mover accent=

Kleber, V.; Büscher, M.; Chernyshev, V.P.; Dymov, S.; Fedorets, P.; Grishina, V. Yu.; Hanhart, C.; Hartmann, Michael; Hejny, V.; Khoukaz, A.; Koch, H.; Komarov, V.I.; Kondratyuk, L.A.; Koptev, V.; Lang, N.; Merzliakov, S.; Mikirtychiants, S.; Nekipelov, M.; Ohm, H.; Petrus, A.; Prasuhn, D.; Schleichert, R.; Sibirtsev, A.; Stein, H. J.; Ströher, H.; Watzlawik, K.-H.; Wüstner, P.; Yaschenko, S.; Zalikhanov, B.; Zychor, I.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.172304

Cited by 31 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 39 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our model prediction was A K − d = (−1.80 + i1.55) fm with an uncertainty of about ±10%. Later, a work [45] came out in which an ingenious method was devised in extracting the K • d scattering length from the reaction pp → K • K + d [46]. The result appeared to prefer a smaller value in magnitude both for the real and imaginary parts: it looked as if our model result were off by two to three standard deviations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Faddeev-chiral unitary approach to theK−dscattering length

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Our earlier Faddeev three-body study in the K − -deuteron scattering length, A K − d , is revisited here in the light of the recent developments in two fronts: (i) the improved chiral unitary approach to the theoretical description of the coupled KN related channels at low energies, and (ii) the new and improved measurement from SIDDHARTA Collaboration of the strong interaction energy shift and width in the lowest K − -hydrogen atomic level. Those two, in combination, have allowed us to produced a reliable two-body input to the three-body calculation. All available low-energy K − p observables are well reproduced and predictions for the KN scattering lengths and amplitudes, (πΣ) • invariant-mass spectra, as well as for A K − d are put forward and compared with results from other sources. The findings of the present work are expected to be useful in interpreting the forthcoming data from CLAS, HADES, LEPS and SIDDHARTA Collaborations.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Faddeev-chiral unitary approach to theK−dscattering length

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They are from Refs. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. On a first view the cross sections seem to follow an universal curve except for the dd → K + K − α reaction, which is completely off the other data.…”

Section: Kaon Pair Productionmentioning

confidence: 91%

Strangeness production in hadron reactions

Machner¹,

Hinterberger²,

Siudak³

2012

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3) An interpolation of the pn results to energies where pp → dK +K 0 was measured [270,271] gives isospin ratios of σ 0 /σ 1 = 0.9±0.9 at Q = 47 MeV and 0.5±0.5 at 105 MeV, Fig. 77.…”

Section: Kaon Pair Production In Nucleon-nucleon Collisionsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…The resulting total cross sections are shown in Fig. 77 along with those for pp → dK +K 0 [270,271].…”

Section: Kaon Pair Production In Nucleon-nucleon Collisionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Total cross section for non-φ KK production in nucleon-nucleon collisions near threshold. The closed circles denote pn → dK + K − data [273] and the open triangles pp → dK +K 0 [270,271], whereas the open circles show the results for pp → ppK + K − up to 2008 [256,257,258,261,168]. The dotted curve is the best fit to the pp → dK +K 0 data within a simple final state interaction model [103], whereas the solid curve includes also the isospin-zero contribution needed to describe the energy dependence of the pn → dK + K − total cross section.…”

Section: Kaon Pair Production In Nucleon-nucleon Collisionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation