1957
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.108.1294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Li7(p, n), (p, p

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best fits are obtained by minimizing These results are essentially the same as those found by Newson et al (1957) from fitting (J'pn/k and (J'pp' values only. Since E1 is small we refer to the Z-state as the threshold state, or the 18'9 MeV state of 8 Be.…”
Section: One-level R Matrix Fit To Datasupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best fits are obtained by minimizing These results are essentially the same as those found by Newson et al (1957) from fitting (J'pn/k and (J'pp' values only. Since E1 is small we refer to the Z-state as the threshold state, or the 18'9 MeV state of 8 Be.…”
Section: One-level R Matrix Fit To Datasupporting
confidence: 62%
“…There is appreciable (10%) isospin mixing in the 18·9 MeV T level of 8Be, and its FWHM as observed in different reactions is expected to vary from about 20 to 200 keV, for good energy resolution. It may be noted that such values of the FWHM are consistent with a partial proton width rp = 2Pp yip of about 0·4 MeV, so that there is no inherent contradiction in the width values quoted by Newson et al (1957) and by Arnold et al (1974).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As suggested in Ref. [25], the shape of the cross section near threshold can be reproduced by the Breit-Wigner single-resonance formula reduced to…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There are three available measurements of the reaction cross section near threshold [18,25,26] 7 Li(p,n) 7 Be reaction cross section derived from the energy spectrum (close square with error bars) normalized to Macklin and Gibbons [18] and to Newson et al [25] scaled to Macklin and Gibbons. Sekharan et al [26] data are also plotted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%