2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.062002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

W-Boson Production in Association with a Jet at Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order in Perturbative QCD

Abstract: We present the complete calculation of W-boson production in association with a jet in hadronic collisions through next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) in perturbative QCD. To cancel infrared divergences, we discuss a new subtraction method that exploits the fact that the N-jettiness event-shape variable fully captures the singularity structure of QCD amplitudes with final-state partons. This method holds for processes with an arbitrary number of jets and is easily implemented into existing frameworks for high… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
390
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(394 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
390
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been possible thanks to the development of subtraction schemes [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70], slicing methods [60,61,71] and the calculation of several two-to-two virtual amplitudes [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91]. As far as top-quark pair production is concerned, besides our own calculation [10,92] only partial results are known at the differential level [93,94]; there is also progress at the level of total crosssection [95] obtained with slicing methods.…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)034mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been possible thanks to the development of subtraction schemes [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70], slicing methods [60,61,71] and the calculation of several two-to-two virtual amplitudes [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91]. As far as top-quark pair production is concerned, besides our own calculation [10,92] only partial results are known at the differential level [93,94]; there is also progress at the level of total crosssection [95] obtained with slicing methods.…”
Section: Jhep05(2016)034mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subtraction schemes based on factorization theorems include the recently introduced N -jettiness subtraction scheme [137][138][139], based on the N -jettiness event shape [140], as well as the SCET based subtraction scheme for NNLO semileptonic top quark decays of ref. [141].…”
Section: Jhep11(2017)142mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no initial collinear singularities appear in this calculation. A powerful generalization of this idea applicable to general initial and final states was introduced in [4,16]. It is obtained by replacing the q T variable with the event-shape N -jettiness variable [66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corresponding two-loop soft functions are also known for zero-jettiness [71,72] and for general Njettiness [73]. The first process calculated at NNLO using this method was pp → W +jet [16], followed by calculations of the pp → Higgs+jet [8] and pp → Z +jet [18] processes, and by detailed phenomenological studies of these processes at this order [74][75][76]. pp → H and pp → Z were also calculated using this method [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%