1977
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.15.3105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

π±p,K±p,

Abstract: The differentlal cross sectlons for the elastlc scattering of ?r+, 9-, K + , K -, p, and on protons have been measured In the t interval -0.04 to -0 75 G~V~ at five momenta: 50, 70, 100, 140, and 175 GeV/c. The t distributions have been parametrized by the quadratic exponential form d o / d t = A exp(Bl tl + ~i t l ' ) and the energy dependence has been described in terms of a slngle-pole Regge model. The pp and K + p dlffractlon peaks are found to shrink with a' -0 20 and -0.15 G~v-', respectively. The jip di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[2,4,8,10]. All selected data for pp [2,4,8,10,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] andpp [56,60,[65][66][67][68][69] scattering are displayed in Tables I and II, respectively, together with our results for G 2 and β. The errors in the experimental data corresponds to statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature and the errors in the parameters of the model were obtained from error propagation from the data uncertainties.…”
Section: Diffractive Excitation In Pp Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2,4,8,10]. All selected data for pp [2,4,8,10,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64] andpp [56,60,[65][66][67][68][69] scattering are displayed in Tables I and II, respectively, together with our results for G 2 and β. The errors in the experimental data corresponds to statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature and the errors in the parameters of the model were obtained from error propagation from the data uncertainties.…”
Section: Diffractive Excitation In Pp Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…43.86 ± 0.22 8.2 ± 0.4 2.56 ± 0.20 0.264 ± 0.016 11.54[56] 43.00 ± 0 22. 7.30 ± 0.47 2.21 ± 0.21 0.291 ± 0.022 13.76 [56] 42.04 ± 0.21 7.8 ± 0.6 2.53 ± 0.31 0.255 ± 0.024 16.26 [56] 41.80 ± 0.21 7.52 ± 0.6 2.41 ± 0.30 0.264 ± 0.026 18.17 [56] 41.60 ± 0.21 7.12 ± 0.52 2.23 ± 0.25 0.279 ± 0.024 30.4 [60] 42.13 ± 0.58 7.16 ± 0.44 2.21 ± 0.21 0.284 ± 0.023 52.6 [60] 43.32 ± 0.34 7.44 ± 0.44 2.25 ± 0.20 0.289 ± 0.021 62.3 [60] 44.12 ± 0.40 7.46 ± 0.44 2.19 ± 0.19 0.300 ± 0.022 546 [65, 66] 61.26 ± 0.93 12.87 ± 0.30 3.11 ± 0.15 0.319 ± 0.015 547 [67] 61.90 ± 1.6 13.30 ± 0.61 3.23 ± 0.31 0.313 ± 0.027 1800 [68] 71.71 ± 2.02 15.79 ± 0.87 3.38 ± 0.38 0.351 ± 0.034 1800 [65, 66] 80.03 ± 2.24 19.70 ± 0.85 4.20 ± 0.45 0.337 ± 0.030 1800 [69] 72.10 ± 3.3 16.6 ± 1.6 3.67 ± 0.75 0.333 ± 0.056 TABLE II: Experimental data on σtot and σ el frompp scattering considered in this analysis and the values of the parameters G 2 and β of Miettinen-Pumplin model determined with Eqs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. The non-normalized experimental data [31] were normalized to the experimental data [30] at p L = 50 GeV/c and [32] at p L = 100 GeV/c. It is clear that the coincidence of the theoretical curves and exper-imental data was obtained sufficiently good for both the energies and the whole examined region of the momentum transfer.…”
Section: Model Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffraction cone behavior changed at larger transferred momenta |t| to a slower t-dependence. Somewhat later, the energy range was extended to 50 GeV [10,11,12]. With the advent of new accelerators, the data for pp scattering at energies √ s ≈ 19,20,23,28,31,45,53,62 GeV were published [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28] and the data for pp at 31,53,62,546,630,1800,1980 GeV [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38] appeared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%