D-Wave Effects in High-Energy Proton-Deuteron Scattering

High-Energy Hadron--Deuteron Scattering.

“…• 1968) It is-therefore tempting to associate the absence of the dip with the quadrupole deformation of the deuterbn~ because this nu~leus has spin one (Harrington, 1968a Franco and Glauber (1969) and are in good agreement with the experimental data. Figure 1-7 shows the comparison of the theoretical calculations (Franco and Glauber, 1969) and the experimental data at 1 and 2 GeV.…”

“…Franco, , 1968Franco and Coleman, 1966;Kuja1-rski, Sachs, and Trefil, 1968;Franco and Glauber, 1969) The first experimental data on p-d elastic scattering (Kirillov.a et al, 1964;Belletini et al, 1965;Zolin et al, 1966;Coleman et al, 1966Coleman et al, , 1967 (Coleman et a1.,1966) confirmed the importance of the double scattering term in the region of four-momentum transfers 50) and were in excellent agreement with the theoretical calculations of Franco and Coleman (1966). However, these larger-angle data did not Several suggestions \vere proposed to understand this apparent paradox: momentum-transfer dependence of the phases of the protonneutron and proton-proton arnpli tudes (Bennett et al, 1967) ·' spin effects (Kujawski, Sachs, and Trefil, 1968;Franco, 1968), influence of three-body forces (Harrington, 1968a) or of inelastic intermediate " states _ (Pumplin and Ross, 1968;Alberi and Bertocchi, 1969a;. As in any good thriller, though, there is one crucial fact which…”

Quadrupole deformation of deuterons and final-state interaction in→2(e,eBianconi1, Jeschonnek2, Николаев3 et al. 1996Phys. Rev. C151110View full textAdd to dashboardCite

“…For this reason of small FSI effects, W + (p m , θ = 180 o ) (dashed curve in Fig.6a) has a shallow dip and W + (p m , θ = 0 o ) (solid curve in Fig.6a) has a shoulderlike structure at p m very close to the position of the dip in the PWIA distribution Fig.6a are enhanced for the destructive S-D interference, see eqs. (7,8). In The origin of this excess lies in the θ-function which emerges in the idealized form of the Glauber FSI operator (20).…”

“…Fig.7b) and at p (2) m = 1.58f m −1 for the Bonn wave function (solid curve in Fig.7b), with allowance for FSI a position of the dip of W o (p m , θ = 90 o ) at p m = p (7) m is predicted very close for the Paris (dashed curve in Fig.7a) and Bonn (solid curve in Fig.7a) potentials: p (7) m = 1.206f m −1 and p (7) m = 1.208f m −1 , respectively. This suggests that the actual value of p (7) m is much more sensitive to the strength of the FSI rather than to the wave function. The difference between W + (p m , θ = 90 o ) for the Paris (dotted curve in Fig.7a tot .…”

Erratum: Refined Glauber model versus Faddeev calculations and experimental data for pd spin observables [Phys. Rev. C 81 , 014004 (2010)]

“…In preceding years, some papers have been published that considered the following contributions separately: (i) spin dependence of NN amplitudes [14,15], (ii) D wave of the deuteron [16,17], (iii) isospin dependence of NN amplitudes, i.e., double charge-exchange contribution to pd elastic scattering [18,19]. All these items were included later in the so-called relativistic multiple-scattering theory [5,6] which went beyond the Glauber framework by accounting for corrections to the eikonal and fixed-scatterer approximations and some relativistic effects as well.…”