2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.85.065016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Q6flavor symmetry model for the extension of the minimal standard model by three right-handed sterile neutrinos

Abstract: and MINOS results. Furthermore, the tiny active-sterile mixing is related to the mass ratio between the lightest active and lightest sterile neutrinos. * araki@ihep.ac.cn † liyufeng@ihep.ac.cn

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
39
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Explicitly, for the former and the Higgs sector respectively, the first and second family have been put together in a flavor doublet 2, and the third family is a singlet 1 S (2 ⊕ 1 S ); this choice predicts hierarchical quark mass matrices which may be put into two mass textures (generalized Fritzsch mass textures) fashion that fit the CKM matrix very well as can be found in [34,48,68]. On the contrary, for the leptonic sector, the first family is a singlet 1 S and the second and third families are put in a doublet 2 (1 S ⊕ 2); this assignation is a natural way to get the μ-τ symmetry [63,[80][81][82][83]. Remarkably, the NOνA collaboration is testing the μ-τ symmetry and some results have been released [2].…”
Section: Flavored Left-right Symmetric Modelmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Explicitly, for the former and the Higgs sector respectively, the first and second family have been put together in a flavor doublet 2, and the third family is a singlet 1 S (2 ⊕ 1 S ); this choice predicts hierarchical quark mass matrices which may be put into two mass textures (generalized Fritzsch mass textures) fashion that fit the CKM matrix very well as can be found in [34,48,68]. On the contrary, for the leptonic sector, the first family is a singlet 1 S and the second and third families are put in a doublet 2 (1 S ⊕ 2); this assignation is a natural way to get the μ-τ symmetry [63,[80][81][82][83]. Remarkably, the NOνA collaboration is testing the μ-τ symmetry and some results have been released [2].…”
Section: Flavored Left-right Symmetric Modelmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…[67,159]. There are several scenarios that predict eigenvalues of M M at or below the electroweak scale, including the inverse seesaw [237] and linear seesaw [238], the νMSM [239,240], low-scale seesaw (e.g. [220][221][222]), or Coleman-Weinberg type models [216], see also section 6.…”
Section: The Seesaw Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q 6 includes µ − τ symmetry as subgroup, and one can exploit it to derive the observed large atmospheric and small reactor mixing angles [240].…”
Section: Q 6 Symmetry (Author: T Araki)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known examples include a non-standard L e − L µ − L τ lepton number [44][45][46] or a Q 6 symmetry [47], which both force the lightest sterile neutrino to be exactly massless in the symmetry limit but generate a small non-zero mass once the symmetry is broken. Alternatively, a certain mechanism could be used to suppress masses and mixings at the same time, and proposals include the use of the Froggatt-Nielsen mechanism [48] to explain light sterile neutrinos [49] as well as the use of exponential suppressions arising from extra spatial dimensions [50,51].…”
Section: Jhep07(2014)039mentioning
confidence: 99%