2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.103001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

g Factor of Lithiumlike Silicon and Calcium: Resolving the Disagreement between Theory and Experiment

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Detailed analysis are conducted on the contributions from the positive and negative energy states, Breit interaction, QED effects and nuclear recoil. The calculated g factor for Ca 17+ agrees very well with the most accurate experimental measurement [11] and some available theoretical results [12,33,35,36,38], with a difference of 2.4 × 10 −5 . The g factors of the ground state of Sn 47+ and Bi 80+ ions are theoretically determined to be 1.980429 and 1.934759 respectively, with a calculation accuracy at the level of 10 −5 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Detailed analysis are conducted on the contributions from the positive and negative energy states, Breit interaction, QED effects and nuclear recoil. The calculated g factor for Ca 17+ agrees very well with the most accurate experimental measurement [11] and some available theoretical results [12,33,35,36,38], with a difference of 2.4 × 10 −5 . The g factors of the ground state of Sn 47+ and Bi 80+ ions are theoretically determined to be 1.980429 and 1.934759 respectively, with a calculation accuracy at the level of 10 −5 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The presently calculated contribution of the QED effect, using equation (4), is 0.00232 as listed in table 5. Our result for Ca 17+ ions is in good agreement with the ab initio QED calculations [12,33,35,36,38], which include the contributions of the first and second order as well as the screened QED effects. The differences between our calculation and these ab initio QED calculations are of the order of 10 −7 .…”
Section: Landé G Factorsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations