2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.74.054606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

α+C12inelastic angular distribution and nuclear size of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because of the feature peculiar in the inelastic scattering, in which the size of the final wave function is filtered by the size of the initial wave function. As pointed out in Refs [10,11], the inelastic scattering going to the excited states are dominated by the size of the coupling potential, which induces the transition from the incident 0 + 1 state to the final 2 + 1,2 state. Since the coupling potential is determined by the overlap of the initial and final wave function, the size of the coupling potential is restricted by the distribution of the initial wave function.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is because of the feature peculiar in the inelastic scattering, in which the size of the final wave function is filtered by the size of the initial wave function. As pointed out in Refs [10,11], the inelastic scattering going to the excited states are dominated by the size of the coupling potential, which induces the transition from the incident 0 + 1 state to the final 2 + 1,2 state. Since the coupling potential is determined by the overlap of the initial and final wave function, the size of the coupling potential is restricted by the distribution of the initial wave function.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a coupling potential, which EPJ Web of Conferences 163, 00026 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201716300026 FUSION17 induces a transition from the initial channel to the final channel, is expected as a main ingredient for the angular distribution of the inelastic scattering, and the distortion potential or the density distribution in the exit channel may be not so effective in comparison to the effect of the coupling potential. In fact, a dominance of the coupling potential in the inelastic scattering has been already pointed out by Takashina et al [10,11]. By employing the MCC calculation, which is the same method as in Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite a rather clear understanding of its three-α structure, the description of the Hoyle state appeared in reaction observables, the (α, α ′ ) inelastic scattering cross section in particular, has not been achieved. It was reported in many studies [1][2][3][4] that the (α, α ′ ) cross section theoretically obtained with using the transition density of 12 C from the ground state to the 0 + 2 state significantly overshot the observed cross section. This puzzle is called the missing monopole strength of the Hoyle state [2] and was not solved in the last decade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%