2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2006.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

F-isocrystals and homotopy types

Abstract: We study a positive characteristic analogue of the nonabelian Hodge structure constructed by Katzarkov, Pantev, and Toen on the homotopy type of a complex algebraic variety. Given a proper smooth scheme X over a perfect field of characteristic p and a Tannakian category C of isocrystals on X , we construct an object X C in a suitable homotopy category of simplicial presheaves whose category of local systems is equivalent to C in a manner compatible with cohomology. We then study F-isocrystal structure on these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New examples of homotopy types which are not realizable by smooth projective varieties can be constructed that way. I should also mention [Ol1,Ol2] in which a crystalline and a p-adic analog of the constructions above have been studied. 6.…”
Section: Schematic Homotopy Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New examples of homotopy types which are not realizable by smooth projective varieties can be constructed that way. I should also mention [Ol1,Ol2] in which a crystalline and a p-adic analog of the constructions above have been studied. 6.…”
Section: Schematic Homotopy Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, if content in rules and processes use XML for specifications, there exists an open-source XML content translator [81] called Nikse. Fig.…”
Section: Third Refinement Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAut J .X Remarks 7.37 (1) In the case when X is projective and R is a quotient of Gal $ f .X x k /, this is essentially the main formality result of [32,Section 4], which has since been extended to the general projective case in [33,Theorem 7.22], although Frobenius-equivariance is not made explicit there. The proofs also differ in that they work with minimal algebras, rather than minimal Lie algebras.…”
Section: Varieties Over Finite Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%