2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-016-1230-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MMinte: an application for predicting metabolic interactions among the microbial species in a community

Abstract: BackgroundThe explosive growth of microbiome research has yielded great quantities of data. These data provide us with many answers, but raise just as many questions. 16S rDNA—the backbone of microbiome analyses—allows us to assess α-diversity, β-diversity, and microbe-microbe associations, which characterize the overall properties of an ecosystem. However, we are still unable to use 16S rDNA data to directly assess the microbe-microbe and microbe-environment interactions that determine the broader ecology of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Namely, we used these models to generate hypotheses about associations between predicted metabolic interactions among these organisms and patterns in their cooccurrence or exclusion. Details of this analysis are discussed in references 28, 34, and 47, but briefly, we conducted a BLAST sequence similarity search (63) comparing each enriched OTU to a database of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences for prokaryotic taxa with whole-genome sequences in NCBI, compiled by Mendes-Soares et al (47). The ModelSEED framework (46) was used to reconstruct and gap-fill metabolic models for the genomes most similar to eelgrass-enriched OTUs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Namely, we used these models to generate hypotheses about associations between predicted metabolic interactions among these organisms and patterns in their cooccurrence or exclusion. Details of this analysis are discussed in references 28, 34, and 47, but briefly, we conducted a BLAST sequence similarity search (63) comparing each enriched OTU to a database of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences for prokaryotic taxa with whole-genome sequences in NCBI, compiled by Mendes-Soares et al (47). The ModelSEED framework (46) was used to reconstruct and gap-fill metabolic models for the genomes most similar to eelgrass-enriched OTUs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, while predictions from metabolic modeling are consistent with prior studies of host-supplied compounds on seagrass surfaces (e.g., see reference 23), these predictions come with caveats and should be interpreted as hypotheses. The metabolic models analyzed herein are derived from 16S rRNA sequences and involve automated metabolic network reconstruction (46,47). This approach may be less accurate than manual curation of metabolic models and is limited by the availabilities of sequenced prokaryotic genomes, but it permits the analysis of a large number of microbial taxa that would otherwise be intractable and indeed reflects a large proportion of the metabolic needs of these organisms (47).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbial metabolic models and the tools built around these models provide an opportunity to examine microbial community interactions [3840] and test the relationship between microbial hydrogen sulfide production and CRC. Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are reconstructed metabolic networks based on complete annotated genome sequences [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently developed tools allow users to assess pairwise (e.g. MMINTE [38]) or community interactions (e.g. MICOM [40,43]) between microbial GEMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, if the system given in Eqs. (14) and (15) is 217 evolved forward until w Ii (c i (t)) becomes infeasible, the time at which the system 218 becomes infeasible is the time at which we have some (w Ii ) j = 0 for j ∈ I i . Thus, we 219 need to resolve Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%