2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MLSS concentration: Still a poorly understood parameter in MBR filterability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MLSS>10.5 g/L, provides samples with worse filterability. The obtained results are in agreement with our previous work (Lousada-Ferreira et al, 2010) and support the initial hypothesis. The MLSS concentration has a direct impact on sludge viscosity, i.e.…”
Section: Filterability and Cake Layer Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MLSS>10.5 g/L, provides samples with worse filterability. The obtained results are in agreement with our previous work (Lousada-Ferreira et al, 2010) and support the initial hypothesis. The MLSS concentration has a direct impact on sludge viscosity, i.e.…”
Section: Filterability and Cake Layer Parameterssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…One filtration measurement was performed with the original non-diluted sample and the other two with diluted samples. The diluted samples were prepared according to the methodology described in Lousada-Ferreira et al (2010). The experiments were performed with the following goals: (i) set 1 to 22 to characterize the MBR activated sludge; (ii) set 23 to 28 to compare sludge from membrane and aeration tanks, within one full-scale MBR installation; (iii) set 29 to 32 to compare sludge from different MBRs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the review paper of Le-Clech et al [5], it is noticed that some authors report an increasing biomass concentration as a positive impact on membrane fouling, whereas others report a negative correlation whilst yet another group finds the influence of MLSS insignificant. More recently, also the existence of an optimal MLSS concentration range is suggested [6]. The lack of a clear correlation between MLSS concentration, which is basically the simplest parameter to measure, and any other foulant characteristics indicates that the MLSS concentration (alone) is a poor indicator for biomass fouling propensity [5].…”
Section: Biomass Concentration or Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids (Mlss)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten different MBRs in Belgium and the Netherlands, treating both municipal (4) and industrial (6) wastewaters, were sampled in both winter and summer. The Delft Filtration Characterization method (DFCm) was chosen to determine activated sludge filterability [14], instead of calculating sludge properties from process permeability, i.e., flux and TMP, in each installation.…”
Section: Extracellular Polymeric Substances (Eps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can change the particulate structure or release polymers. Samples originally above 10 g/L showed worse filterability when diluted because many small particles (<10-20 m) were formed by deflocculation [106].…”
Section: 123mentioning
confidence: 99%