International Conference on Computing, Communication &Amp; Automation 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ccaa.2015.7148550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MLPNN based handwritten character recognition using combined feature extraction

Abstract: Statistical techniques for off-line character recognition are not flexible and adaptive enough for new handwriting constraints. Offline handwritten character recognition of English alphabets using a three layered feed forward neural network is presented in this paper. The proposed recognition system describes the evaluation of feed forward neural network by combining four different feature extraction approaches(box approach, diagonal distance approach, mean and gradient operations).The proposed recognition sys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is an extension of previous work done by authors in the field of off-line handwritten character recognition [3] [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This paper is an extension of previous work done by authors in the field of off-line handwritten character recognition [3] [4] [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…If the input modalities are dynamic or online, recognition is addressed in real-time. Offline recognition refers to delayed time recognition [1]. Offline recognition occurs when text is scanned and saved as an image on paper.…”
Section: Basic Of Character Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of Chen [14] uses two smaller subsets of MNIST, one that had only digits 0 and 1 (12,665 samples for the trainset and 2115 for the testset) and the other only digits 3 and 5 (11,552 samples for the trainset and 1902 for the testset) and trained two feedforward NNs as a binary logistic regression model with the SGD training algorithm and batch size of 1. Furthermore, he conducted experiments by varying the trainset size from 5% to 100%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the information from Table 6, we can conclude that our approach has reasons to be characterized as among the best, if not as the best. The approach in [11], although it declares slightly more than 2% better accuracy, it lacks the ability to recognize logic characters, which has added an extra level of difficulty to our approach. Furthermore, a more time-consuming feature extraction approach is used.…”
Section: Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%