2005
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MLH1 Germline Epimutations as a Factor in Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
158
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
158
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No methylation was detected in their peripheral blood lymphocytes (data not shown), suggesting that methylation was somatically acquired and localized, as opposed to constitutional, such as that found in carriers of MLH1 epimutations. [34][35][36][37] In the tumours of each of these seven cases, at least one additional gene within 3p22 was concomitantly methylated with MLH1 ( Figure 6). In five cases, the tumours were BRAF V600E mutant and in four the tumours were CIMP þ (Table 6).…”
Section: Association Between Methylation Of Individual 3p22 Genes Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No methylation was detected in their peripheral blood lymphocytes (data not shown), suggesting that methylation was somatically acquired and localized, as opposed to constitutional, such as that found in carriers of MLH1 epimutations. [34][35][36][37] In the tumours of each of these seven cases, at least one additional gene within 3p22 was concomitantly methylated with MLH1 ( Figure 6). In five cases, the tumours were BRAF V600E mutant and in four the tumours were CIMP þ (Table 6).…”
Section: Association Between Methylation Of Individual 3p22 Genes Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA (1 -2 mg) was converted with sodium bisulphite and the 'A' and 'C' regions of the MLH1 promoter were subject to combined bisulphite restriction analyses (COBRA) as previously described (Hitchins et al, 2005). Samples giving a positive restriction digestion pattern indicative of the presence of methylation were cloned into the pGEMTeasy vector (Promega, Annandale, NSW, Australia), and individual clones were fluorescently sequenced on an ABI 3100 using SP6 and T7 vector primers.…”
Section: Methylation Analysis Of Mlh1 Promotermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 These cases have tended to be sporadic due to the spontaneous origination of the epimutation in carriers and its subsequent eradication in the germline. [12][13][14][15] However, a handful of familial cases with an MLH1 epimutation have been reported in which transmission of the epimutation between generations has been shown to occur in both non-Mendelian 14 and autosomal dominant patterns, with the latter linked to localized cis-acting genetic anomalies. 16,17 In a Caucasian family from Western Australia (WA Family 16), dominant transmission of a mosaic MLH1 epimutation was demonstrated through three successive generations linked to a particular haplotype bearing two single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) in tandem; promoter substitution c. À27C4A and missense variant c.85G4T (p.A29S) (according to coding reference sequence NM_000249.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%