2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2020.108103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MK-801 impairs working memory on the Trial-Unique Nonmatch-to-Location test in mice, but this is not exclusively mediated by NMDA receptors on PV+ interneurons or forebrain pyramidal cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zebrafish have homologues of each of these neurotransmitter systems (Horzmann & Freeman, 2016), and results from the present study support findings from human and rodent studies of impaired working memory as a result of pharmacologically blocking glutamatergic, cholinergic and dopaminergic receptors (K. A. Ellis & Nathan, 2001;Myhrer, 2003;Shapiro & Caramanos, 1990;Sokolenko et al, 2020;van der Staay et al, 2011), thus highlighting the suitability of zebrafish as a behavioural model for assessing working memory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Zebrafish have homologues of each of these neurotransmitter systems (Horzmann & Freeman, 2016), and results from the present study support findings from human and rodent studies of impaired working memory as a result of pharmacologically blocking glutamatergic, cholinergic and dopaminergic receptors (K. A. Ellis & Nathan, 2001;Myhrer, 2003;Shapiro & Caramanos, 1990;Sokolenko et al, 2020;van der Staay et al, 2011), thus highlighting the suitability of zebrafish as a behavioural model for assessing working memory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The touchscreen TUNL task of spatial working memory is a nonmatch to location task, and is sensitive to dysfunction of hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (McAllister, Saksida, & Bussey, 2013; Talpos et al, 2010). Previous studies have shown that accuracy in this task is reduced following treatment with NMDAr antagonists in rodents, including MK-801 (Davies, Hurtubise, Greba, & Howland, 2017; Hurtubise et al, 2017; Kumar et al, 2015; Sokolenko et al, 2019, 2020). Our data here are in keeping with these previous studies, showing that MK-801 impairs working memory using variable delays between the sample and choice phases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…J. Wang, 1999), so it is perhaps not surprising that this cognitive function is disrupted when antagonists of this receptor are administered. Several labs are now trying to conclusively elucidate the specific receptor subtypes (Kumar et al, 2015), and cellular (Sokolenko et al, 2020) and electrophysiological (Korotkova et al, 2010; Sokolenko et al, 2019) substrates which mediate these effects. It is also possible to assess the effects of trial difficulty, or pattern separation, in the TUNL task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests a sensitivity of the task that may be particularly important when studying manipulations more subtle than large-scale lesions or inactivations. Further characterization demonstrated that exposure to systemic NMDAr antagonist MK-801 also significantly reduces mouse TUNL performance independent of delay length ( Sokolenko et al, 2019 , 2020 ). In the current study, we demonstrate that an updated version of the mouse TUNL protocol is also dependent on the functioning of the mPFC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%