1994
DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90776-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MK-801 does not prevent acute stimulatory effects of amphetamine or cocaine on locomotor activity or extracellular dopamine levels in rat nucleus accumbens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower doses of dizocilpine have no e¤ect on the reinforcing e¤ect of cocaine measured with a FR (present results) or PR (Ranaldi et al 1996) schedule of reinforcement, while a slightly higher doses of dizocilpine (0.20.3 mg / kg) decrease responding for cocaine maintained by FR (Shoab et al 1995) or PR (Ranaldi et al 1996) schedules. These Þndings are consistent with observations that higher doses of dizocilpine result in an increase in locomotor activity accompanied with motor impairment and ataxia in rodents (Carter 1994;Wolf et al 1994;Druhan et al 1996) that is not observed at doses less than 0.25 mg / kg (see Fig. 3; Kalivas and Alesdatter 1993;Stewart and Druhan 1993;Jeziorski et al 1994;Wolf et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lower doses of dizocilpine have no e¤ect on the reinforcing e¤ect of cocaine measured with a FR (present results) or PR (Ranaldi et al 1996) schedule of reinforcement, while a slightly higher doses of dizocilpine (0.20.3 mg / kg) decrease responding for cocaine maintained by FR (Shoab et al 1995) or PR (Ranaldi et al 1996) schedules. These Þndings are consistent with observations that higher doses of dizocilpine result in an increase in locomotor activity accompanied with motor impairment and ataxia in rodents (Carter 1994;Wolf et al 1994;Druhan et al 1996) that is not observed at doses less than 0.25 mg / kg (see Fig. 3; Kalivas and Alesdatter 1993;Stewart and Druhan 1993;Jeziorski et al 1994;Wolf et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, in the present study subchronic PCP treatment substantially increased amphetamine-induced locomotor hyperactivity without altering the NAc dopamine levels, suggesting that the enhancement of activity could not be attributed to increased activity within the mesoaccumbens system. This finding is consistent with the results of both Druhan et al (1996) and Wolf et al (1994), who observed that MK-801 potentiated amphetamine-induced hyperactivity without, itself, inducing dopamine release in NAc or potentiating amphetamine-induced dopamine release. It has recently been suggested that locomotor effects of acutely administered PCP reflect its actions within PFC rather than NAc (Adams and Moghaddam, 1998;Jentsch et al, 1998b) which is consistent with an earlier work of Nabeshima et al (1983).…”
Section: Dissociation Between Behavioral Effects and Nac Dopamine Relsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The lack of an increase in extracellular DA after MK-801 injections also was not due to an insensitivity of the microdialysis assay to changes in voltage-dependent release; DA concentrations in the NAS were significantly reduced following administration of apomorphine at doses that are known to decrease firing rates of mesolimbic DA cells (Akaoka et al, 1992;Grace and Bunney, 1985). These considerations, together with other concurring findings (Rossetti et al, 1992;Segal et al, 1995;Wolf et al, 1994b), lead us to conclude that the behavioral activation produced by MK-801 does not result from changes in NAS DA transmission, and that either non-DA or extra-NAS DA neurons mediate the locomotor stimulant effects of MK-801.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%