Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes

Rolo, Víctor; Roces‐Díaz, José V.; Torralba, Mario; Kay, Sonja; Fagerholm, Nora; Aviron, Stéphanie; Burgess, Paul J.; Crous-Duran, Josep; Ferreiro-Domínguez, N.; Graves, Anil; Hartel, Tibor; Mantzanas, K.; Mosquera-Losada, María Rosa; Palma, J.H.N.; Sidiropoulou, Anna; Szerencsits, Erich; Viaud, Valérie; Herzog, Félix; Plieninger, Tobías; Moreno, Gerardo

doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101318

Cited by 31 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 62 publications

(80 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Achieving the ESV improvement implies a reduction in urban per capita disposable income and an increase in the agricultural output, which is impossible due to the promotion of urban livelihood and urbanisation processes. In addition, AI also shows a significant negative correlation with ESV, which conforms to the results from the study by Tran et al (2022) in the Manawatu-Wanganui region of the North Island, New Zealand, and the study by Rolo et al (2021) in 12 rural regions across 9 European countries, including Mediterranean, Atlantic, Boreal and Continental [56,57]. The relationship between ESV and landscape pattern have all been diagnosed.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development

Zeng

Liu

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Humans benefit from ecosystem services (ES) and profoundly influence the ecosystem in rapid urbanisation and large-scale urban sprawl contexts, especially at the landscape level. However, the impacts of landscape pattern, the driving mechanism of sub-ES and the spatially explicit regional optimisation, have been largely ignored. In response, to the present paper explores two primary aspects: the relationship among ES, landscape pattern, urban income and agricultural output, and the regional governance of optimised ES values (ESV), using the Wuhan urban agglomeration as a case study area. The survey method is employed in obtaining the adjusted magnitude matrix of land use and ecosystem services. Spatial regression analyses are conducted on each ES, including food provision, climate regulation and soil maintenance, with socio-economic indicators and landscape pattern index as explanatory variables. Finally, geographically weighted regression and scenario analyses are conducted on each sub-ESV to generate adjusted coefficients in each county for ESV regulation. The results show that urban per capita disposable income and agricultural output significantly contribute to ESV change, with the former being negative and the latter being positive. A highly aggregated landscape also produces reduced ESV, particularly in soil maintenance and gas and climate regulation. We summarise the ESV in 2020 and in the period after adjustment in different administrative counties. Provision, regulation and culture ecosystem benefits substantially increase when attempts are made to lower the landscape aggregation pattern by 1%. In general, counties and county-level cities have the largest ESV, with food provision as the optimum ecosystem benefit. Districts in the capital city show an immense growth in provision and regulation, and county-level cities show the highest growth rate in cultural service. Integrating the landscape pattern into characterising and optimising ES, provides references for regional governance on land-use planning and socio-economic development, which is vital to sustainable regional development.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development

Zeng

Liu

et al. 2022

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Erosion control was more influenced by transversal practices, such as extending stand rotation, rotation of livestock resting areas, and fencing tree regeneration areas to avoid soil degradation (Ruiz-Mirazo and Robles, 2012), and also by seeding understorey herbaceous species. In a similar fashion, the contribution of the SMP to the provision of cultural ES was comparatively lower, despite the potential of agroforestry for its enhancement when compared to agricultural or forest land uses (Rolo et al, 2021). While promoting cultural ES is supported by forest managers (Torralba et al, 2020), it is necessary a holistic and multidisciplinary of cultural ES to meet social demands (Milcu et al, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Disentangling the Role of Management Practices on Ecosystem Services Delivery in Mediterranean Silvopastoral Systems: Synergies and Trade-Offs Through Expert-Based Assessment

Lecegui¹,

Olaizola²,

Varela³

2021

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Sereke et al, 2015). Landscapes with trees are rated higher for their visual quality (Schüpbach et al, 2020) and for recreation, social interaction, and spiritual values than open farmland (Rolo et al, 2021).…”

Section: Modern Agroforestry Systems For Biodiversity Ecosystem Servi...mentioning

confidence: 99%

IALE 2022 European Landscape Ecology Congress : book of abstracts

Wolski¹,

Regulska²,

Affek³

2022

IALE 2022 European Landscape Ecology Congress : Book of Abstracts

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to the Declaration of Consent to Publication and Assignation of Copyright (https://www.iale2022.eu/programme/call-abstracts.html) all Authors collectively accept and confirm that submission of the abstracts to the IALE 2022 Congress constitutes their consent to publication in the Book of Abstracts. Each Author warrants and represents that he/she is the sole owner or has the rights of all the information and content provided. The publication of the abstract does not infringe any third party rights including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights. Each Author grants the Editors (Congress organisers) a royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable nonexclusive license to use, reproduce, publish, translate, distribute, and display the content.

show abstract

Mixtures of forest and agroforestry alleviate trade-offs between ecosystem services in European rural landscapes

Cited by 31 publications

References 62 publications

Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development

Integrating Landscape Pattern into Characterising and Optimising Ecosystem Services for Regional Sustainable Development

Disentangling the Role of Management Practices on Ecosystem Services Delivery in Mediterranean Silvopastoral Systems: Synergies and Trade-Offs Through Expert-Based Assessment

IALE 2022 European Landscape Ecology Congress : book of abstracts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About