1995
DOI: 10.2307/2986139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixture Models for the Analysis of Repeated Count Data

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the FMNB-2 model was considered more useful and parsimonious than the finite mixture of Poisson regression models (termed as a FMP-K models; K represents the number of components). The FMP-K models often produce too many components (Van Duijn and Böckenholt, 1995), making it difficult to apply. For this purpose, a Monte Carlo simulation is conducted using various sample sizes under different sample-mean values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the FMNB-2 model was considered more useful and parsimonious than the finite mixture of Poisson regression models (termed as a FMP-K models; K represents the number of components). The FMP-K models often produce too many components (Van Duijn and Böckenholt, 1995), making it difficult to apply. For this purpose, a Monte Carlo simulation is conducted using various sample sizes under different sample-mean values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, m, with the conditioning ni0 ≥ c as well. With c = 0, the bivariate distribution ofÑi becomes negative trinomial (Bates and Neyman, 1951;Cameron and Trivedi, 1998;Winkelmann, 2003;Zelterman, 2006;van Duijn, 1993;Iwasaki and Yeom, 2007), which should be identical to two independent Poisson when α → ∞. The probability mass function for this truncated distribution is λ0, λ1, β, δ, γ0, γ1) and Pr…”
Section: Conditioning By Baseline Measurement and Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them consist of two random effect components representing the patient heterogeneity in terms of baseline and pre-post change. For the latter, we used log-normal or discrete random effect parameters, both of which have been widely used for expressing the inter-subject heterogeneity in the analysis of over-dispersed data (Tango, 1989;van Duijn and Bockenholt, 1995;McLachlan and Peel, 2000;Booth et al, 2003;Farewell and Sprott, 1988;Diggle et al, 2002).…”
Section: Motivation and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Poisson factor analysis corresponds to the case of a;=0 and E(Xij I O ,• )= Var(Xi; I ei, • ). The term a;h in (5) is the extra-Poisson or overdispersion variation (see e.g., Engel, 1984 ;Van Duijn, 1993) contributed by the "specific factor" 7)ij when given ei.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the extended models of Rasch's multiplicative Poisson model (Rasch, 1960(Rasch, / 1980 for subjects by tests frequency tables (e.g., Jansen & Van Duijn, 1992 ;Van Duijn, 1993 ;Ogasawara, 1996b), the Poisson parameter (see (2)) takes the form such as ai/3j=exp(lnai+ln/3j)=exp(ai+/3;).…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%