2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.101.054005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing effects of Σ0Λ0 in Λc+ decays

Abstract: We analyze the mixing between Σ 0 and Λ 0 based on the baryon masses. We distinguish the contributions from QCD and QED in the baryon mass splittings. We find that the mixing angle between Σ 0 and Λ 0 is ð2.07 AE 0.03Þ × 10 −2 , which leads to the decay branching fraction and up-down asymmetry of Λ þ c → Σ 0 e þ ν e to be BðΛ þ c → Σ 0 e þ ν e Þ ¼ ð1.5 AE 0.2Þ × 10 −5 and αðΛ þ c → Σ 0 e þ ν e Þ ¼ −0.86 AE 0.04, respectively. Moreover, we obtain that ΔB ≡ BðΛ þ c → Σ 0 π þ Þ − BðΛ þ c → Σ þ π 0 Þ ¼ ð3.8 AE 0.5… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We measure the ratio of branching fractions where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third from the reference mode Λ + c → pK − π + . This result is consistent with the LHCb result (9.4 ± 3.9) × 10 −4 [12], and agrees with the theoretical predictions of (11.4 ± 5.4) × 10 −4 [13] and (6.3 ± 3.4) × 10 −4 [14] within uncertainties based on the SU(3) F flavor symmetry. However, our result contradicts the QCD dynamical model prediction of (3.4 − 3.8) × 10 −4 [15].…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We measure the ratio of branching fractions where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third from the reference mode Λ + c → pK − π + . This result is consistent with the LHCb result (9.4 ± 3.9) × 10 −4 [12], and agrees with the theoretical predictions of (11.4 ± 5.4) × 10 −4 [13] and (6.3 ± 3.4) × 10 −4 [14] within uncertainties based on the SU(3) F flavor symmetry. However, our result contradicts the QCD dynamical model prediction of (3.4 − 3.8) × 10 −4 [15].…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They measured a branching fraction value of B(Λ + c → pω) = 9.4 ± 3.9) × 10 −4 [12]. Theoretical predictions exist, for this particular decay, based either on SU(3) F flavor symmetry [13,14] or QCD dynamical model predictions [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the nonfactorizable amplitudes do contribute in those decays, providing possibilities to explore the nonfactorizable parts. However, it has to be emphasized that the argument would not hold once the Σ 0 − Λ mixing are considered [32], which would cause deviations at O(10 −2 ) level.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In two-body decays, T-odd observables can be constructed in the spin correlations among the particles [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Since the particle spins could not be directly measured in the current high energy physics experiments, we have to extract their effects through the angular distributions in the cascade decays [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%