2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-020-01588-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing convex-optimization bounds for maximum-entropy sampling

Abstract: The maximum-entropy sampling problem is a fundamental and challenging combinatorial-optimization problem, with application in spatial statistics. It asks to find a maximum-determinant order-s principal submatrix of an order-n covariance matrix. Exact solution methods for this NP-hard problem are based on a branch-and-bound framework. Many of the known upper bounds for the optimal value are based on convex optimization. We present a methodology for "mixing" these bounds to achieve better bounds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, for each i ∈ N . This gives a nice concave decreasing sequence of eigenvalues that is preserved under matrix inversion (see [CFLL21]).…”
Section: Appendix 2: Test Instancesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, for each i ∈ N . This gives a nice concave decreasing sequence of eigenvalues that is preserved under matrix inversion (see [CFLL21]).…”
Section: Appendix 2: Test Instancesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…where γ > 0 is a scaling parameter that must be judiciously selected (see [Ans20,CFLL21]), and e is an all-ones vector.…”
Section: Local Search On Tridiagonal Masksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the factorization bound shifts by the same amount as z(C, s, A, b), under scaling of C by γ, we cannot improve on the factorization bound by scaling. In contrast, the linx bound is very sensitive to the choice of the scale factor, and while we can compute an optimal scale factor for the linx bound (see Chen et al (2021)), it is a significant computational burden to do so.…”
Section: Dfactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 3, we discuss the numerical experiments where, using a commercial nonlinearprogramming solver, we calculate upper bounds for benchmark instances of MESP from the literature with the three relaxations presented, namely DDFact, complementary DDFact and linx, and with the "mixing" strategy described in Chen et al (2021). Generally, we found that a commercial nonlinear-programming solver is quite viable for our relaxations, even for DDFact which has some nondifferentiabilty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation