2004
DOI: 10.2514/1.5360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing and Combustion Studies Using Cavity-Based Flameholders in a Supersonic Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
147
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 310 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has shown that in the case of a cavity with the fuel injector inside the cavity, the open cavity with the aft ramp has a higher performance as a flame holder [22], although the performance depends on injection position [22,30]. However, in the case of a cavity with upstream fuel injection, a small L/D has better performance for flame stabilization compared to the cavity with the aft ramp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research has shown that in the case of a cavity with the fuel injector inside the cavity, the open cavity with the aft ramp has a higher performance as a flame holder [22], although the performance depends on injection position [22,30]. However, in the case of a cavity with upstream fuel injection, a small L/D has better performance for flame stabilization compared to the cavity with the aft ramp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…A cavity model also enhances the characteristics of air mixing [20], and it has been investigated as a flame holding mechanism for the scramjet engine [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Additionally, the cavity model possesses the feature of comparatively low profile drag compared to a step injector model [33,34] or strut injector model [35,36], although this feature depends strongly on the cavity geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main parameters to evaluate efficiency of the combustion chamber are the mixture degree, ignition condition, combustion efficiency and pressure losses. Results of experimental researches at different Mach numbers [9][10], however, have shown essential discrepancy between real characteristics of combustion chamber and anticipated values, in particular, in realization of self-ignition and achievement of high level of combustion efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although laser-based techniques like coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) (Eckbreth et al 1988, Vereschagin et al 2001, Cutler et al 2003, O'Byrne et al 2007) and planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) (Allen et al 1993, McMillin 1993, McIntyre et al 1997, Gruber et al 2004) have proved to be very useful in laboratory scramjet tests because of their nonintrusive, species-specific measurement capabilities, these techniques require large, expensive pulsed laser systems that cannot realistically be put onto a flight experiment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%