2014
DOI: 10.3390/mi5040913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixing Analysis of Passive Micromixer with Unbalanced Three-Split Rhombic Sub-Channels

Abstract: Abstract:A micromixer with unbalanced three-split rhombic sub-channels was proposed, and analyses of the mixing and flow characteristics of this micromixer were performed in this work. Three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations in combination with an advection-diffusion model with two working fluids (water and ethanol) were solved for the analysis. The mixing index and pressure drop were evaluated and compared to those of a two-split micromixer for a range of Reynolds numbers from 0.1-120. The results indicate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. It can be seen from our results that efficient mixing usually occurs when a strong as highlighted in the review of Hessel et al [12] or in the particular cases of Bhagat et al [3], Wang et al [40] and Hossain and Kim [14]. In the aforementioned studies (and numerous others), the devices considered reach mixing indexes of up to 0.5 − 0.6 (using similar performance measurement methods).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…3. It can be seen from our results that efficient mixing usually occurs when a strong as highlighted in the review of Hessel et al [12] or in the particular cases of Bhagat et al [3], Wang et al [40] and Hossain and Kim [14]. In the aforementioned studies (and numerous others), the devices considered reach mixing indexes of up to 0.5 − 0.6 (using similar performance measurement methods).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Recently, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become very popular technique to analyze the mixing and fluid flow in micromixers. In recent years, many investigations have been performed to improve the mixing in a variety of passive micromixers; T-type micromixer (Gobby et al 2001 ) and Y-type micromixer (Sahu et al 2012 ), serpentine micromixers (Beebe et al 2001 ; Hossain et al 2009 ; Ansari and Kim 2009 ; Sahu et al 2013 ), split-and-recombinination (SAR) micromixers (Lee and Lee 2008 ; Viktorov and Nimafar 2013 ; Nimafar et al 2012a , b ; Hossain and Kim 2014 ), patterned grooves micromixers (Ansari and Kim 2007 ; Hossain et al 2010a , b ), etc. It was exposed that shifting the inlet direction in a T-type micromixer did not appreciably improve the mixing performance (Gobby et al 2001 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A grid sensitivity test was performed for the mixing efficiency to determine the optimum number of grid points for each micromixer. Grid systems with 2.5ˆ10 5 , 3ˆ10 5 , and 5ˆ10 5 nodes were found to be optimal for the Tear-drop, the Y-Y, and the H-C mixers, respectively.…”
Section: Numerical Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixing within microfluidic devices, typically operating at Reynolds numbers smaller than 100, is heavily dependent on molecular diffusion [4], which is a very slow process [5]. Accordingly, in absence of any transverse convection, complete mixing of two fluids conveyed in a simple channel, as in a T-mixer, normally needs a long time and long channel length [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%