2007
DOI: 10.1109/vetecs.2007.269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Traffic HSDPA scheduling - Impact on VoIP Capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The result is roughly 210ms additional processing delay when using a real embedded VoIP client. This value differs considerably from the more optimistic processing delay estimations of 50-75ms available in research from [14] [6].…”
Section: Figure 10 Offset Delay Measurement Environmentcontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The result is roughly 210ms additional processing delay when using a real embedded VoIP client. This value differs considerably from the more optimistic processing delay estimations of 50-75ms available in research from [14] [6].…”
Section: Figure 10 Offset Delay Measurement Environmentcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In particular, in late 2007, advances such as CS over HSPA [6]. In addition, the estimations used in simulations are in general overly optimistic in regards to, e.g.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These techniques enable lower link latency and significantly higher data rates in comparison to earlier UMTS releases, making HSDPA a key step in the evolution toward mobile broadband Internet. Research on engineering HSDPA networks ranges from analysis of physicaland link-layer capacity [8,16], resource sharing and admission control strategies [4,21], scheduling policies [6,10,15,18], to performance consideration in network dimensioning and planning [3,20,26,28]. The last topic is becoming increasingly important as the HSDPA service grows rapidly in scale, and it leads to new optimization problems in view of the current literature (e.g., [2,19]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%