2008
DOI: 10.1785/0120060140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Signal Processing for Regional and Teleseismic Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a frequency of 0.25 Hz aliasing is not a problem but the main lobe of the response is quite broad, taking about 5 -6 s/deg to decay to half-power ( Figure 2). This causes a decrease in the precision of slowness estimates, and can sometimes cause peaks from two plane waves incident in the same time window to smear into one apparent peak with a slowness maximum in between the two true slownesses [e.g., Shumway et al, 2008]. Because of this problem, and the aliasing problem mentioned above, we focused on frequencies between 0.25 and 0.75 Hz in the square of slowness space defined by ±50 s/deg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a frequency of 0.25 Hz aliasing is not a problem but the main lobe of the response is quite broad, taking about 5 -6 s/deg to decay to half-power ( Figure 2). This causes a decrease in the precision of slowness estimates, and can sometimes cause peaks from two plane waves incident in the same time window to smear into one apparent peak with a slowness maximum in between the two true slownesses [e.g., Shumway et al, 2008]. Because of this problem, and the aliasing problem mentioned above, we focused on frequencies between 0.25 and 0.75 Hz in the square of slowness space defined by ±50 s/deg.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the best estimator for the signal can be approximated: first by filtering the data into the signal band, and then by delaying and averaging, that is, we compute the estimator In the geophysical literature, this is called 'beam-forming,' and it depends critically on the assumption that the signal is a plane wave propagating across the array with a fixed velocity and azimuth (direction in degrees measured clockwise from north). For details on this computation and extensions to multiple signal and noise sources, see Shumway et al (2008). Figure 3 shows the estimated signal compared with the raw signal observed at the first sensor, and we find improvements in signal-to-noise ratio, particularly when the signal arrives; the first arrival is enhanced, and a clear representation of the first two cycles can be important for discrimination between earthquakes and nuclear explosions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The signals arrive at different times T i , i = 1,2,…, N , relative to some arbitrary start point, with the time delays Ti=bold-italicribold-italicθ giving the relation of the array coordinate vector r i =( r i 1 , r i 2 )′ in km to a slowness parameter θ ′=( θ 1 , θ 2 ) in second/km. The slowness parameter is directly related to the velocity and azimuth of a propagating plane wave (see Shumway et al () for details). The coordinates for the nine vertical recording channels of the Makanche are shown in Figure .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Partially this is due to this specific distance being near a branch intersection on the traveltime curve ( Figure 7.2), however it is also indicative of the small aperture of CMAR as discussed in the introduction. More sophisticated techniques (i.e., Capon, 1969;Schmidt, 1986;Shumway et al, 2008) could potentially provide more accurate estimates of slownesses for triplicated arrivals; however, all slowness estimators are likely to have problems when the signals arrive from similar directions at similar times (Shumway et al, 2008).…”
Section: Chinese Nuclear Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%