2022
DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-mw4gp
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-Reference Spin-Flip Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory for Accurate X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Abstract: It is demonstrated that the challenging core hole-particle (CHP) orbital relaxation for core electron spectra can be readily achieved by the mixed-reference spin-flip (MRSF)-TDDFT. With the additional scalar relativistic effects on K-edge excitation energies of 24 second- and 17 third-row molecules, the particular ∆CHP-MRSF(R) exhibited near perfect predictions with RMSE ∼ 0.5 eV, featuring a median value of 0.3 and and an interquartile range of 0.4. Overall, the CHP effect is 2 ∼ 4 times stronger than relativ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[99][100][101][102] Despite its shortcomings, the main tool for routine calculation of XAS is TD-DFT. Furthermore, due to the recent advances in LR-DFT-based theory 103,104 the efficient implementations of DSCF methods, 105 and specialized basis sets, 74 techniques based on mean field approaches will likely remain the workhorses for the calculation of core spectra. Nonetheless, considering an accuracy of less than 0.2 eV attained by the DCCSD schemes S2 and S3 for specific transitions, we expect these to be a promising method for providing benchmark theory-based core excitation/ionization numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[99][100][101][102] Despite its shortcomings, the main tool for routine calculation of XAS is TD-DFT. Furthermore, due to the recent advances in LR-DFT-based theory 103,104 the efficient implementations of DSCF methods, 105 and specialized basis sets, 74 techniques based on mean field approaches will likely remain the workhorses for the calculation of core spectra. Nonetheless, considering an accuracy of less than 0.2 eV attained by the DCCSD schemes S2 and S3 for specific transitions, we expect these to be a promising method for providing benchmark theory-based core excitation/ionization numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 The particular formulation of MRSF-TDDFT combined with maximum-overlap method (MOM) also provides a significant advantage in the computation of X-ray absorption. 16,35 Although LR-TDDFT 29 has been the most popular method for valence excited state studies, the accuracy of TDDFT to predict experimental Xray states is very crude, with errors as large as ∼10 eV for second-period elements like C, N, O, and F, 36 and even larger errors for heavier elements. These large shifts are attributed to the lack of description of core-hole orbital relaxation effects in the approximate exchangecorrelation functionals used in TDDFT, which cannot account for the drastic change in the Coulomb interaction of the remaining electrons when a core electron is excited.…”
Section: X-ray Spectrum From Mixedreference Spin-flip Timedependent D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These major challenges can be easily overcome by MRSF-TDDFT with the help of its high-spin triplet reference, which allows a core-hole particle (CHP) pair. The particular ∆CHP-MRSF flavor (referred to for simplicity as ∆MRSF in the following) was designed in our previous work, 16 that we briefly summarize here. In the ∆MRSF approach, the excitation energy is calculated as the energy difference between the X-ray state computed with MRSF-TDDFT using a core-hole triplet state as the reference and the singlet ground state computed at the restricted Kohn-Sham level.…”
Section: X-ray Spectrum From Mixedreference Spin-flip Timedependent D...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations