Mixed Reality in the Reconstruction of Orbital Floor: An Experimental and Clinical Evaluative Study

Rahimov, ChingizR; Aliyev, DanizU; Rahimov, NurmammadR; Farzaliyev, IsmayilM

doi:10.4103/ams.ams_141_21

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Rahimov et al showed a mean deviation of 0.9 mm, ranging from 0.65 to 1.15 mm [ 20 ]. However, this study was performed using Microsoft HoloLens-printed skulls.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this study was performed using Microsoft HoloLens-printed skulls. In two cases, the surgeon was not able to concentrate their attention on both holographic and real objects [ 20 ]. Another study [ 19 ] calculated the technical accuracy of a Microsoft HoloLens on printed fractured orbits by calculating fiducial registration errors, target registration errors and guidance errors.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Augmented and Virtual Reality for Preoperative Trauma Planning, Focusing on Orbital Reconstructions: A Systematic Review

Dubron

Verbist

Jacobs

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: This systematic review summarizes recent literature on the use of extended reality, including augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and virtual reality (VR), in preoperative planning for orbital fractures. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane on 6 April 2023. The included studies compared extended reality with conventional planning techniques, focusing on computer-aided surgical simulation based on Computed Tomography data, patient-specific implants (PSIs), fracture reconstruction of the orbital complex, and the use of extended reality. Outcomes analyzed were technical accuracy, planning time, operative time, complications, total cost, and educational benefits. Results: A total of 6381 articles were identified. Four articles discussed the educational use of VR, while one clinical prospective study examined AR for assisting orbital fracture management. Conclusion: AR was demonstrated to ameliorate the accuracy and precision of the incision and enable the better identification of deep anatomical tissues in real time. Consequently, intraoperative imaging enhancement helps to guide the orientation of the orbital reconstruction plate and better visualize the precise positioning and fixation of the PSI of the fractured orbital walls. However, the technical accuracy of 2–3 mm should be considered. VR-based educational tools provided better visualization and understanding of craniofacial trauma compared to conventional 2- or 3-dimensional images.

show abstract

“…Rahimov et al showed a mean deviation of 0.9 mm, ranging from 0.65 to 1.15 mm [ 20 ]. However, this study was performed using Microsoft HoloLens-printed skulls.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Augmented and Virtual Reality for Preoperative Trauma Planning, Focusing on Orbital Reconstructions: A Systematic Review

Dubron

Verbist

Jacobs

et al. 2023

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mixed reality (MR) can address the effects of inadequate visualization of intraoperative 2D images and unintuitive presentation of the affected area and can greatly alleviate the hand-eye incongruity associated with viewing medical images during surgery. Rahimov et al (2022) incorporated virtual planning and MR techniques into orbital reconstruction surgery, using virtual planning to develop a detailed and accurate surgical plan and then MR to make the preoperatively developed surgical plan visible to the surgeon in real time, providing intraoperative navigation for orbital reconstruction. After the actual clinical trial, it was found that the patient's eye mobility improved and diplopia was reduced after the surgical reconstruction.…”

Section: Trauma and Facial Reconstructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computer-Aided Dynamics Intraoperative Navigation in Oral Medicine: A Review

Jiang

Zhang

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because the oral and maxillofacial areas are adjacent to important organs such as the brain and the eyes and contain a rich network of nerves and blood vessels, this poses a great challenge for surgery of the oral and maxillofacial areas. Traditional treatment protocols rely excessively on the physician's clinical experience and imagination for preoperative planning and do not provide intuitive and reliable intraoperative guidance to the physician during surgery. With the rapid development of medical imaging technology, computer-aided dynamic intraoperative navigation (CADIN) has been introduced into the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery for its ability to accurately locate key anatomical structures intraoperatively and provide the surgeon with a safe surgical boundary in real time. However, the vast majority of surgeries in oral and maxillofacial surgery are still dominated by traditional surgical methods without intraoperative guidance or computer-assisted static navigation (CASN), and CADIN techniques are not widely used. Therefore, this paper presents a systematic review of the application of CADIN technology in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery from 2018-2023 by searching the PubMed database, discusses the problems faced in the actual clinical application of CADIN technology in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, and proposes solutions to improve the accuracy and application scope of CADIN technology in the future.

show abstract