Abstract:Purpose
This study presents a novel surgical navigation tool developed in mixed reality environment for orthopaedic surgery. Joint and skeletal deformities affect all age groups and greatly reduce the range of motion of the joints. These deformities are notoriously difficult to diagnose and to correct through surgery.
Method
We have developed a surgical tool which integrates surgical instrument tracking and augmented reality through a head mounted display.… Show more
“…The selected articles included three RCTs [5,21,22] and 18 NRCTs [11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] (five pilot, three prospective comparative, two prospective observational, two prospective cohort, two prospective case-control, two retrospective comparative, two retrospective cohort). Studies were published between 2013 [21] and 2021 [28]. VR was used for training procedures and preoperative planning [2,3,5,21,22,27,32,33,36].…”
Section: Study Selection and Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VR was used for training procedures and preoperative planning [2,3,5,21,22,27,32,33,36]. AR was utilized for preoperative planning and intraoperative purposes [2,3,11,[23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31]34,35,[37][38][39]. AI was found reported only in two studies and was adopted to improve the preoperative diagnosis accuracy [27,33].…”
Section: Study Selection and Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MINORS tool was used to assess the risk of bias in NRCTs. Among these studies, fifteen studies (83.3%) [11,24,25,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] had a low risk of bias, and three studies (16.7%) [23,26,28] had a high risk of bias. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and MINORS were reported in Tables 1 and 2.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen studies were included (five pilot, one retrospective cohort, two retrospective comparative, two prospective comparative, one prospective case-control, two prospective cohort, one prospective observational) [11,[23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31]34,35,[37][38][39]. The authors of these studies reported that AR efficiently aided surgeons in performing surgical operations.…”
Section: Outcome: Intraoperative Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware used in these procedures included head-mounted displays, such as HoloLens or Xvision (Augmedics). One of the articles mentioned MR [28] rather than AR. Different AR registration techniques were used in these studies.…”
Background: The application of virtual and augmented reality technologies to orthopaedic surgery training and practice aims to increase the safety and accuracy of procedures and reducing complications and costs. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarise the present literature on this topic while providing a detailed analysis of current flaws and benefits. Methods: A comprehensive search on the PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Embase database was conducted from inception to February 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to improve the reporting of the review. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality and potential bias of the included randomized and non-randomized control trials, respectively. Results: Virtual reality has been proven revolutionary for both resident training and preoperative planning. Thanks to augmented reality, orthopaedic surgeons could carry out procedures faster and more accurately, improving overall safety. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising technology with limitless potential, but, nowadays, its use in orthopaedic surgery is limited to preoperative diagnosis. Conclusions: Extended reality technologies have the potential to reform orthopaedic training and practice, providing an opportunity for unidirectional growth towards a patient-centred approach.
“…The selected articles included three RCTs [5,21,22] and 18 NRCTs [11,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] (five pilot, three prospective comparative, two prospective observational, two prospective cohort, two prospective case-control, two retrospective comparative, two retrospective cohort). Studies were published between 2013 [21] and 2021 [28]. VR was used for training procedures and preoperative planning [2,3,5,21,22,27,32,33,36].…”
Section: Study Selection and Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VR was used for training procedures and preoperative planning [2,3,5,21,22,27,32,33,36]. AR was utilized for preoperative planning and intraoperative purposes [2,3,11,[23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31]34,35,[37][38][39]. AI was found reported only in two studies and was adopted to improve the preoperative diagnosis accuracy [27,33].…”
Section: Study Selection and Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MINORS tool was used to assess the risk of bias in NRCTs. Among these studies, fifteen studies (83.3%) [11,24,25,27,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] had a low risk of bias, and three studies (16.7%) [23,26,28] had a high risk of bias. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and MINORS were reported in Tables 1 and 2.…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen studies were included (five pilot, one retrospective cohort, two retrospective comparative, two prospective comparative, one prospective case-control, two prospective cohort, one prospective observational) [11,[23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31]34,35,[37][38][39]. The authors of these studies reported that AR efficiently aided surgeons in performing surgical operations.…”
Section: Outcome: Intraoperative Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware used in these procedures included head-mounted displays, such as HoloLens or Xvision (Augmedics). One of the articles mentioned MR [28] rather than AR. Different AR registration techniques were used in these studies.…”
Background: The application of virtual and augmented reality technologies to orthopaedic surgery training and practice aims to increase the safety and accuracy of procedures and reducing complications and costs. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarise the present literature on this topic while providing a detailed analysis of current flaws and benefits. Methods: A comprehensive search on the PubMed, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Embase database was conducted from inception to February 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to improve the reporting of the review. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess the quality and potential bias of the included randomized and non-randomized control trials, respectively. Results: Virtual reality has been proven revolutionary for both resident training and preoperative planning. Thanks to augmented reality, orthopaedic surgeons could carry out procedures faster and more accurately, improving overall safety. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising technology with limitless potential, but, nowadays, its use in orthopaedic surgery is limited to preoperative diagnosis. Conclusions: Extended reality technologies have the potential to reform orthopaedic training and practice, providing an opportunity for unidirectional growth towards a patient-centred approach.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and application value of mixed reality technology (MR) in Primary retroperitoneal tumour (PRT) surgery.MethodsFrom 276 patients who underwent PRT resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, we screened 46 patients who underwent MR‐assisted retroperitoneal tumour resection and 46 patients who underwent tumour resection without MR assistance. The intraoperative and postoperative recovery of the patients in both groups were compared, and the reliability and validity of the application of MR were further examined using the Likert scale.ResultsThere was a significant difference in the mean intraoperative bleeding volume between the two groups, but it was reduced in the MR group. The results of the Likert scale showed higher scores in the MR group than non‐MR group.ConclusionsMR can be used to assist PRT resection and has great potential to improve the rate of complete retroperitoneal tumour resection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.