Mixed reality and three dimensional printed models for resection of maxillary tumor: a case report

Abstract

In the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery, many institutions have recently begun using threedimensional printers to create three-dimensional models and mixed reality in a variety of diseases. Here, we report the actual situation model which we made using three-dimensional printer from virtual operation data and the resection that was performed while grasping a maxillary benign tumor and neighboring threedimensional structure by designing an application for Microsoft®︎ HoloLens, and using Mixed Reality surgery support during the procedure.

XR (Extended Reality: Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality) Technology in Spine Medicine: Status Quo and Quo Vadis

“…For medical students and residents, the lack of an accurate understanding of the three-dimensional positioning of the organs makes it difficult to assess preoperative images and understand surgical techniques. Case-specific 3D holograms can be used as a new educational tool to improve the competency of medical students and residents [44], and as a tool for patient education [45]. Since XR technology is computer-based, it can perform learning activities that would be impossible in the real world.…”

Using mixed reality and CAD/CAM technology for treatment of maxillary non-union after Le Fort I osteotomy: a case description

“…We have applied CAD/CAM and MR ( 16 , 17 ) in various oral surgeries including orthognathic surgery and obtained good results. In addition, the application of MR technology enables the evaluation and confirmation of the 3D position of the maxilla during surgery ( 17 ).…”

Microsoft HoloLens 2 in Medical and Healthcare Context: State of the Art and Future Prospects

“…The full texts of 83 papers assessed for eligibility were carefully analyzed. Thirteen articles [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ] were excluded due to the exclusion criteria (1), one contribution [ 29 ] due to the exclusion criteria (2), 17 scientific results [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ] due to the exclusion criteria (3) and 5 [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 ] contributions due to the exclusion criteria (4). Finally, only 47 studies were included in the quantitative synthesis.…”