Mixed qualitative–quantitative approach for bidding decisions in construction

Abstract

PurposeThe bid/no-bid decision is critical to the success of construction contractors. The factors affecting the bid/no-bid decision are either qualitative or quantitative. Previous studies on modeling the bidding decision have not extensively focused on distinguishing qualitative and quantitative factors. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to improve the bidding decision in construction projects by developing tools that consider both qualitative and quantitative factors affecting the bidding decision.Design/methodology/approachThis study proposes a mixed qualitative-quantitative approach to deal with both qualitative and quantitative factors. The mixed qualitative-quantitative approach is developed by combining a rule-based expert system and fuzzy-based expert system. The rule-based expert system is used to evaluate the project based on qualitative factors and the fuzzy expert system is used to evaluate the project based on the quantitative factors in order to reach the comprehensive bid/no-bid decision.FindingsThree real bidding projects are used to investigate the applicability and functionality of the proposed mixed approach and are tested with experts of a construction company in Alberta, Canada. The results demonstrate that the mixed approach provides a more reliable, accurate and practical tool that can assist decision-makers involved in the bid/no-bid decision.Originality/valueThis study contributes theoretically to the body of knowledge by (1) proposing a novel approach capable of modeling all types of factors (either qualitative or quantitative) affecting the bidding decision, and (2) providing means to acquire, store and reuse expert knowledge. Practical contribution of this paper is to provide decision-makers with a comprehensive model that mimics the decision-making process and stores experts' knowledge in the form of rules. Therefore, the model reduces the administrative burden on the decision-makers, saves time and effort and reduces bias and human errors during the bidding process.

Analysis Of Dominant Factors Affecting Construction Service Providers On Tender Electronically In Malang Raya 2021

“…Analysis result provider service construction bid on electronic Tender with using SEM, we get that factor provider service bid on tender electronics in the category Economy, environment , market and government (X 4) with Variable Replacement Value loss (X 4.4) gain significant results to get on the call list candidate tender winner (Table 3, dominant test) with weight factor the largest is 0.891. This result is in line with research conducted [6] where the replacement value loss (X4.4) still Becomes reason main happening provider service bid on tenders. Study this use SEM method with SmartPLS software .…”

Soft computing in business: exploring current research and outlining future research directions

“…Topic 16- “Construction Project Management” concerns the research applying soft computing approaches in optimal planning of construction projects (Alotaibi et al ., 2022; Mahdavian and Shojaei, 2020), risk assessment (Elbashbishy et al ., 2022), optimizing the bidding decisions in projects (Mohamed et al ., 2022), construction process optimization (Shen et al ., 2022), cost prediction and optimization (Alsharqawi et al ., 2021; Sharma et al ., 2022a, b), construction schedule optimization (Wu and Ma, 2022), material procurement schedule optimization (Kar et al ., 2021).…”

Climate Justice and Participatory Research

“…To investigate community members' views and document their input on how they were consulted about the port, I used a multi-methods approach (Mohamed, Jafari, & Hammad, 2021). The study included household surveys, questionnaires, interviews with key informants, participant observation, and focus-group discussions.…”