2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2005.tb00250.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Poisson Distributions

Abstract: Mixed Poisson distributions have been used in a wide range of scientific fields for modeling nonhomogeneous populations. This paper aims at reviewing the existing literature on Poisson mixtures by bringing together a great number of properties, while, at the same time, providing tangential information on general mixtures. A selective presentation of some of the most prominent members of the family of Poisson mixtures is made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
205
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 138 publications
(141 reference statements)
2
205
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…After specifying the model, we can devise strategies to find a statistically optimal estimator. If we select the mean squared error (MSE) as the criterion to minimize, then we arrive at the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator also termed posterior mean estimator [23] and is given by (1) which can be written, by applying Bayes' rule, as 2 (2) The marginal distribution of the noisy image appearing in the denominator of (2) belongs to the mixed Poisson distribution family [24]; parameter estimation for an interesting subclass of this family is discussed in [25]. The Bayesian framework is attractive for our problem, but poses two challenges: One is the specification of an appropriate multivariate prior distribution for the intensity image, the other is the solution of the estimation problem in a multidimensional space which can be a formidable task.…”
Section: A Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After specifying the model, we can devise strategies to find a statistically optimal estimator. If we select the mean squared error (MSE) as the criterion to minimize, then we arrive at the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) estimator also termed posterior mean estimator [23] and is given by (1) which can be written, by applying Bayes' rule, as 2 (2) The marginal distribution of the noisy image appearing in the denominator of (2) belongs to the mixed Poisson distribution family [24]; parameter estimation for an interesting subclass of this family is discussed in [25]. The Bayesian framework is attractive for our problem, but poses two challenges: One is the specification of an appropriate multivariate prior distribution for the intensity image, the other is the solution of the estimation problem in a multidimensional space which can be a formidable task.…”
Section: A Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the identity (can be easily verified by direct substitution) (22) where the Polya distribution [29] (also called Dirichlet-multinomial) is defined in Table I, we can write the posterior factors as mixtures of Dirichlet densities (23) Here indicates which mixture component is responsible for generating the observation and the corresponding posterior mixture assignment weights equal (24) Note that the expressions (23) and (24) also cover the separable model, in which case the Dirichlet reduces to beta distribution.…”
Section: A Multiscale Posterior Factorizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main condition for using the Poisson model is the equivalence of mean and variance of the response variable. If this condition is not present, the generalized Poisson distribution model will be appropriate (24)(25)(26). Discrete-count data sometimes show excessive dispersion and cannot be explained by a simple model such as binomial or Poisson.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is a mixed Poisson distribution then it is overdispersed. The probability of observing a zero value is higher than under a Poisson distribution with the same mean, termed zero inflated phenomenon, (see Karlis & Xekalaki, 2005 and references therein). Furthermore, for mean values under 2.4, which includes practically all the real data cases, it is straightforward to prove the termed one-deflated phenomenon, i.e., f PL (1; θ 1 ) < f P (1;…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%