2004
DOI: 10.1080/10652460410001686046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Parseval equation and generalized Hankel-type integral transformation of distributions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various forms of Hankel like integral transforms have been considered in detail in a series of papers [6,7,[10][11][12]22]. We will be concerned here with certain Hankel type transform having relevance among others, in connection with the solution to evolution problems involving the Bessel type differential operators x α+3β−1 ∂ ∂x x 2(α−β)+1 ∂ ∂x x −3α−β and x −3α−β ∂ ∂x x 2(α−β)+1 ∂ ∂x x α+3β−1 with α − β ≥ − 1 2 and −2(α + β) real parameter [6,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various forms of Hankel like integral transforms have been considered in detail in a series of papers [6,7,[10][11][12]22]. We will be concerned here with certain Hankel type transform having relevance among others, in connection with the solution to evolution problems involving the Bessel type differential operators x α+3β−1 ∂ ∂x x 2(α−β)+1 ∂ ∂x x −3α−β and x −3α−β ∂ ∂x x 2(α−β)+1 ∂ ∂x x α+3β−1 with α − β ≥ − 1 2 and −2(α + β) real parameter [6,11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…relevant K− generator(12) being the radical part of the 2D Laplacian operator. In fact, as noted earlier, the Hankel transform of integer Bessel order can be regarded as the radial part of the 2D Fourier transform of rotationally symmetric function, when polar co-ordinates are adopted.In otherwords we have Fa f (ζ, η) (x, y ) = e −imφ e −imθ Ĥa m ρ 1/2 g(ρ) (r ), m = 0, 1, 2, ...(69)where (ρ, φ) and (r, θ) are polar co-ordinates respectively in the function and transform domain and f is a rotationally symmetric function:f (ζ, η) = g(ρ) e imφ .Evidently (69) can be generalised to the transform (21) and (24) as Fa f (ζ, η) (x, y ) = e −imφ e −imθ r −1+2(α+β) Ĥa 1,m ρ 1−2(α+β) g(ρ) (r ), Fa f (ζ, η) (x, y ) = e −imφ e −imθ r −2(α+β) Ĥa 2,m,−2(α+β) ρ 2(α+β) g(ρ) (r )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%