1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01457259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed monolayers of polypeptides

Abstract: Mixed monolayers of two polypeptides, poly-F-methyl-L-glutamate and poly-L-alanine, in the same ce-helix surface conformation, were studied at the water/air interface.From a comparison of the experimental n-A isotherms with Hugglns' theory and from the examination of the MIR spectra for the two components and their mixtures, it was possible to deduce that poly-y-methyl-L-glutamate and poly-L-alanine were totally miscible at the surface with prevalently attractive interactions and that the mixtures maintained t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be easily noted, the collapse pressure varied as the molar ratios varied; this has been previously reported [2] and agrees with miscibility in monolayers. Since the contemporary separation of the two polypeptides seemed to be possible, in order to have information concerning miscibility in the collapsed phase, the respective compositions of the two polypeptides in the collapsed phase were calculated by applying theJoos theory [14] and using the determined ,c values of the components and the mixtures and of already obtained [2] values of the interaction factors. In particular, it can be noted that the richest mixture of I~MG had a zone with an arrest nearly independent of the characteristic zone of PTMG whereas the richest mixture of PLA had, in the same zone, a longer inflection typical of PLA but with less slope.…”
Section: Mixturessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As can be easily noted, the collapse pressure varied as the molar ratios varied; this has been previously reported [2] and agrees with miscibility in monolayers. Since the contemporary separation of the two polypeptides seemed to be possible, in order to have information concerning miscibility in the collapsed phase, the respective compositions of the two polypeptides in the collapsed phase were calculated by applying theJoos theory [14] and using the determined ,c values of the components and the mixtures and of already obtained [2] values of the interaction factors. In particular, it can be noted that the richest mixture of I~MG had a zone with an arrest nearly independent of the characteristic zone of PTMG whereas the richest mixture of PLA had, in the same zone, a longer inflection typical of PLA but with less slope.…”
Section: Mixturessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The materials and methods for this study, as well as the conditions necessary to obtain both the pure components and their mixtures in c~-helix form, are described elsewhere [2]. Since, as is known [7], the collapse pressure and its kinetic behavior depends strongly on the velocity and on the modality of compression, particular care was taken in establishing and maintaining these conditions" the pressure-area isotherms were obtained in a discontinuous manner; the readings were made every 0.03 m/mg; the time interval between two successive readings was gradually increased from 5 to t0 rain in order to obtain a thermodynamic equilibrinm before each new compression, as has been done for other substances [4].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following equation was used Fig. Actual z values may be computed according to Singer theory [13] as described in previous works [14] but they appear to be useless in case of mixtures when strong approximations should be made to account for non-ideality. Joos' parameters and the interaction energies for all the mixtures at various temperatures were calculated, as in previous papers [12], from the relationship A-~kT ~kT z~--6 (2) zl = 6 in closely packed monolayers where zl and ~ are the interaction energy and interaction parameter respectively.…”
Section: Polyphenylmethacrylate-polybenzylmethacrylatementioning
confidence: 99%