2016
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-58392016000400005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed models and multivariate analysis for selection of superior maize genotypes

Abstract: Selections via the mixed model and the multivariate analysis approach can be powerful tools for selecting cultivars in plant breeding programs. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the use of mixed models, multivariate analysis and traditional phenotypic selection to identify superior maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes. Seventy-one (71) maize Topcrosses and three commercial cultivars were evaluated using these three methods. Plant height, ear height, ear placement, stalk lodging and breakage, and grain yield were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the REML/Blup methodology is an important statistical tool, which can help breeders to conduct breeding programs during selection processes. Similar results demonstrating the potential for the REML/Blup technique were seen in studies on beans, by Sousa et al (2017), Gomes et al (2018), and Cruz et al (2018); and maize, by Arnhold et al (2009), Oliveira et al (2016), Entringer et al (2016), and Mendonça et al (2016), all confirming the results of this study. ) and mean grain mass, municipality of Jataí, Goiás State, Brazil, UFG, 2018.…”
Section: Predicted Genetic Values (μ + G)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Thus, the REML/Blup methodology is an important statistical tool, which can help breeders to conduct breeding programs during selection processes. Similar results demonstrating the potential for the REML/Blup technique were seen in studies on beans, by Sousa et al (2017), Gomes et al (2018), and Cruz et al (2018); and maize, by Arnhold et al (2009), Oliveira et al (2016), Entringer et al (2016), and Mendonça et al (2016), all confirming the results of this study. ) and mean grain mass, municipality of Jataí, Goiás State, Brazil, UFG, 2018.…”
Section: Predicted Genetic Values (μ + G)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Evaluation of the results of a treatment given is closely related to the results of the characters involved. However, using more selection characters causes a more significant error rate and effectiveness of an evaluation, especially if a character has a different direction of variation (Oliveira et al, 2016;Nardino et al, 2020). Correlation analysis can be further used to obtain characters that are considered to have a solid relationship with the main character (Fadhilah et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genotypic selection is very difficult with a large number of individuals (Noerwijati et al, 2021). Clustering (multivariate analysis) is an efficient tool for the genotypic selection process (Kozak et al, 2008) that classifies the phenotypic variations with the function of homogeneity within intra-clusters and heterogeneity among the interclusters (Oliveira et al, 2016). Significant intra-cluster variability (p< 0.01) was observed with respect to fruit-quality traits in guava.…”
Section: Selection Of Excellent Introgressed Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%