Mixed-Methods Research with Vulnerable Families

Abstract

The challenges that cause and result from vulnerability in families are complex. Systematic methods for studying the issues underlying vulnerability are needed. In this article, the utility of mixed methods for nursing science with vulnerable families is addressed. The use of mixed methodology resulted in more precise descriptions of the complex reality of living as a vulnerable family, such as living in a family with a member with HIV/AIDS, a child with a chronic condition, or a family member with other life-threatening conditions. Coupling qualitative methods with quantitative methods can illuminate phenomena related to vulnerable families that cannot be captured using a singular approach. To advance our understanding of family vulnerability, it is essential that we define research strategies that contribute to both the depth and the breadth of our knowledge. Mixed methods are logically congruent with this goal.

‘Therapy as well as the tablets’: an exploratory study of service users’ views of community mental health nurses’ (CMHNs) responses to hearing voices

“…Brannen (1992, p. 3) suggests that it is unusual in practice for theory or epistemology to be sole determinants of method. Combining approaches at the level of methods is increasingly common (Coyle & Williams 2000, Shepard et al . 2002).…”

Understanding inadequate pain management in the clinical setting: the value of the sequential explanatory mixed method study

“…Twinn (2003) outlines the status of mixed method design in nursing research and raises important questions about its contribution to nursing knowledge and the issues arising from attempts to use the design within the context of nursing practice. There are many examples of how mixed method designs have been used to address important nursing questions, pertaining to a variety of topics, including; vulnerable families (Shepherd et al 2002), cancer care (McPherson & Leydon 2002), clinical learning environments (Dunn & Hansford 1997) and skill mix (McKenna & Hasson 2002). It has also populated disciplines beyond health and social care to include; computing and maths (Arbogast & Chen 1995), education (Mertens 2004), program evaluation (Lucke et al 2001) and geography (Crang 2002).…”

Identifying indicators of well‐being for caregivers of children with disabilities

“…The qualitative studies suggest subjective perceptions of health, balance of participation in work and leisure, fi nancial resources, and support and life circumstances may be important to an individual's summative assessment of their well-being. To address the complexity of this phenomenon and understand the perspectives of caregivers, a mixed-method approach that triangulates among quantitative and qualitative data was essential (Shepard et al, 2002).…”