2015
DOI: 10.1166/asl.2015.5997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-Methods Research on Support for Fly-In Fly-Out Academics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jais et al. (2015a, b) found that expatriate academics predominantly focus on three major dimensions of organisational support: human resources, financial and career.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Jais et al. (2015a, b) found that expatriate academics predominantly focus on three major dimensions of organisational support: human resources, financial and career.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2014) developed a new framework for better understanding the academic professional experience in a foreign university which includes: work expectations (teaching, research and service), equity (compensation, incentives and benefits), autonomy, academic freedom, flexibility, collegiality, institutional involvement and professional growth. Gress and Shin (2020a) and Jais et al. (2015a, b) focused on work-life balance and its dual impact on expatriate academics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may however represent the multi-disciplinary nature of the publications and research design preferences in some fields. A total of 6 mixed method articles were found combining quantitative and qualitative tools ( Dimberg, Mundt, Sulsky, & Liese, 2001 ; Jais et al, 2015a , Jais et al, 2015b ; Roy & Filiatrault, 1998 ; Shortland, 2015 ; Striker et al, 1999 ). Out of the 36 qualitative articles, the majority used interviews, with a few articles combining interviews with some corporate documentation ( Cardoso & Jordão, 2017 ; Haynes, 2010 ; Mayerhofer, Schmidt, Hartmann, & Bendl, 2011 ; Suutari et al, 2013 ) or focus groups ( Pereira, Malik, Howe-Walsh, Munjal, & Hirekhan, 2017 ; Tahvanainen et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 28 articles (34%), individuals that were not linked to a particular organisation made up the sample, while there were 11 papers (13%) with research in a public sector environment. This setting was unexpected but can be explained as follows; 5 of these papers were based on data within the World Bank Group ( Dimberg et al, 2001 ; Dimberg et al, 2002 ; Espino, Sundstrom, Frick, Jacobs, & Peters, 2002 ; Liese, Mundt, Dell, Nagy, & Demure, 1997 ; Striker et al, 1999 ); another 5 studies were conducted in universities ( Crowne & Engle, 2016 ; Jais et al, 2015a , Jais et al, 2015b ; Jais, Smyrnios, & Hoare, 2015c ; Salt & Wood, 2014 ), and 1 study was within the Irish Defence Forces ( Crowley-Henry & Heaslip, 2014 ). In the remaining 5 papers (6%), regions and countries were the focus of research ( Anderson, 2007 ; Belenkiy & Riker, 2012 ; Collins & Tisdell, 2004 ; Gholipour and Foroughi, 2019 , Gholipour and Foroughi, 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%