2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-014-9858-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed messages: public communication about higher education and non-traditional students in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the limited research on the framing effect in higher education with a focus on professional and vocational education, existing reforms utilising framing often fail to achieve their objectives. For example, in Australia, despite the stated policy goals of broadening access to university, the government and universities have continued to frame universities as elite and exclusive (Snowden and Lewis, 2015). As a result, the communication campaign of the state failed to increase the participation rates of students from non-traditional higher education backgrounds and deepened existing social divides between students with different levels of academic performance.…”
Section: Framing and Educational Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the limited research on the framing effect in higher education with a focus on professional and vocational education, existing reforms utilising framing often fail to achieve their objectives. For example, in Australia, despite the stated policy goals of broadening access to university, the government and universities have continued to frame universities as elite and exclusive (Snowden and Lewis, 2015). As a result, the communication campaign of the state failed to increase the participation rates of students from non-traditional higher education backgrounds and deepened existing social divides between students with different levels of academic performance.…”
Section: Framing and Educational Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Are these institutions seeking to counter academic drift, perhaps because a move towards a research focus is perceived as threatening underpinning values, cultures and practices that are more 'teacherly' and teaching focused? Research that has found a 'research focus' is positioned against a 'teaching focus' by drawing on representations of university elitism -representations of the university, research activities and university educators as elitist -may offer some support to this argument (Feather, 2016;Henderson, 2018;Snowden & Lewis, 2015;Wheelahan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Teaching Scholarship and Research -Keystones Of He And Academic Identity?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Archer (2007) notes in her focus on the discourse of diversity, ‘It is so apparently benign and “good” that it silences other interpretations’, thus ‘render[ing] those who resist it unintelligible or morally reprehensible’ (p. 648). These messages are compounded by the disconnections between policy and media environments within universities, with messages about inclusivity and equity ‘frequently contradicted and neutralized by counter messages that propagate entrenched positions about class, individual ability and suitability and the stratification of higher education by quality’ (Snowden & Lewis, 2015, p. 587).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%