2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-0916-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed messages: fertility signaling interferes with nestmate recognition in the monogynous ant Camponotus floridanus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Le Conte and Hefetz (Le Conte and Hefetz, 2008) proposed a hierarchical model based on worker perception thresholds that assumed that non-nestmate recognition had the lowest discrimination threshold and that subsequent perception of fertility signals necessitated prior acceptance of nestmate status. There is experimental evidence both for (Le Conte and Hefetz, 2008;Cournault and de Biseau, 2009) and against (Moore and Liebig, 2010) this model. Regardless of whether this perception model holds true for most social insects, our data confirm the idea that Denis et al (Denis et al, 2006) and Le Conte and Hefetz (Le Conte and Hefetz, 2008) put forth that individual cuticular compounds can serve multiple functions as signals in different contexts.…”
Section: Hydrocarbon Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, Le Conte and Hefetz (Le Conte and Hefetz, 2008) proposed a hierarchical model based on worker perception thresholds that assumed that non-nestmate recognition had the lowest discrimination threshold and that subsequent perception of fertility signals necessitated prior acceptance of nestmate status. There is experimental evidence both for (Le Conte and Hefetz, 2008;Cournault and de Biseau, 2009) and against (Moore and Liebig, 2010) this model. Regardless of whether this perception model holds true for most social insects, our data confirm the idea that Denis et al (Denis et al, 2006) and Le Conte and Hefetz (Le Conte and Hefetz, 2008) put forth that individual cuticular compounds can serve multiple functions as signals in different contexts.…”
Section: Hydrocarbon Bioassaymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Where the same pheromones are present on brood (Endler et al 2004;van Zweden et al 2009), declining brood number may similarly contribute to these worker responses (Edwards 1987;Endler et al 2004), as well as allowing queens to tune their reproductive rate to the current number of brood as mentioned above. If the queen pheromone also affects worker aggression (as implicated here and in several other ants; Vander Meer & Alonso 2002; Peeters & Liebig 2009;Smith et al 2009;Moore & Liebig 2010;Wurm et al 2010), the pheromone could also be used by the colony to decide who should reproduce. In L. niger, colonies are often co-founded by multiple queens, but only one queen survives after the first workers eclose (Sommer & Hö lldobler 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honeybees, however, have a very low number of GRS, whereas the set of N. vitripennis seems in line with other insects ( n = 10 and n = 58, respectively); both have only ten annotated IRs. Ants also show lineage-specific expansions of desaturase genes, which are probably responsible for synthesizing a more varied mixture of cuticular hydrocarbons, which are important for social insect-specific tasks, such as colony recognition and queen signaling [31,32]. Cytochrome p450 genes have also expanded independently in several ant lineages, possibly reflecting species-specific needs for detoxifying specific food sources.…”
Section: Genomic and Genetic Features Of The Seven Sequenced Ant Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%