2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cherd.2012.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed matrix membranes of Matrimid 5218 loaded with zeolite 4A for pervaporation separation of water–isopropanol mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure showed the gas separation performance of Matrimid®‐ZIF‐11 MMMs as a function of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 wt.% ZIF‐11 loadings. The gas separation performance of the pure Matrimid® membrane obtained in this study was found to be consistent with the values reported in the literature . In the pure Matrimid® membrane, the gas permeation fluxes for H 2 , CO 2 , and CH 4 pure gases were found to be 17.33, 4.20, and 0.26 Barrer, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Figure showed the gas separation performance of Matrimid®‐ZIF‐11 MMMs as a function of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40 wt.% ZIF‐11 loadings. The gas separation performance of the pure Matrimid® membrane obtained in this study was found to be consistent with the values reported in the literature . In the pure Matrimid® membrane, the gas permeation fluxes for H 2 , CO 2 , and CH 4 pure gases were found to be 17.33, 4.20, and 0.26 Barrer, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…7,18,33,37 Membrane thickness of present study is 50 mm and higher ux with marginally decreased in the separation factor can be obtained by decreasing the membrane thickness according to the solution diffusion model 5 and Fick's law of diffusion. Fabrication of composite membrane by applying thin layer of AgNaZ-M5 membrane on porous support is feasible.…”
Section: Comparison Of Pv Performance With Data Reported Recently In mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…In addition, mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) using zeolites such as silicalite-1 (Moermans et al, 2000), ZSM-5 (Zhan et al, 2012) and 4A zeolite (Khosravi et al, 2012;Nigiz et al, 2012), functionalized carbon nanotubes (Qiu et al, 2010) or magnesium oxide (Jiang et al, 2007) as fillers have been studied for the dehydration of ethanol and isopropanol, achieving higher selectivities and/or fluxes than those of the pristine polymer membranes. To improve the matching between the filler and the polymer matrix, MMMs comprising mesoporous inorganic materials such as dual pore SBA-15 and silica MCM-41 Flynn et al, 2013;Kudasheva et al, 2014) have also been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%