2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2012.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed integer programming of multiobjective hydro-thermal self scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model in [25] considers a classical deterministic unit commitment of both thermal and combined cycle units; this minimizes the generation (fuel) costs (no electricity market) by satisfying simple bounds on SO 2 and NO x emissions. A quite common approach by several recent papers to the handling of emission limits involves using multiobjective optimization techniques in which both profits and emissions are minimized [4,28,35], sometimes with additional emissions limit constraints [8]. Despite the interest of all these studies, it is worth mentioning that none of them are optimal-bid models, as their formulations do not incorporate the bid rules of the electricity market, and the influence of the electricity market is reduced either to a deterministic forecasting of the electricity prices [4,8,28] or to the use of spot price scenarios [35].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The model in [25] considers a classical deterministic unit commitment of both thermal and combined cycle units; this minimizes the generation (fuel) costs (no electricity market) by satisfying simple bounds on SO 2 and NO x emissions. A quite common approach by several recent papers to the handling of emission limits involves using multiobjective optimization techniques in which both profits and emissions are minimized [4,28,35], sometimes with additional emissions limit constraints [8]. Despite the interest of all these studies, it is worth mentioning that none of them are optimal-bid models, as their formulations do not incorporate the bid rules of the electricity market, and the influence of the electricity market is reduced either to a deterministic forecasting of the electricity prices [4,8,28] or to the use of spot price scenarios [35].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quite common approach by several recent papers to the handling of emission limits involves using multiobjective optimization techniques in which both profits and emissions are minimized [4,28,35], sometimes with additional emissions limit constraints [8]. Despite the interest of all these studies, it is worth mentioning that none of them are optimal-bid models, as their formulations do not incorporate the bid rules of the electricity market, and the influence of the electricity market is reduced either to a deterministic forecasting of the electricity prices [4,8,28] or to the use of spot price scenarios [35]. Some recent works have taken into account CO 2 emission constraints in the self-scheduling of thermal units (not CCGT units) that operate in electricity markets through two-stage stochastic programming [16,22,29].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Augmented-weighted epsilon-constraint technique is suggested to remedy this deficiency. The details of incorporating lexicographic optimization and augmented-weighted epsilon-constraint technique have been described in our previous paper in the area [37,38]. To avoid tautology in writing, these matters have not been repeated in this paper.…”
Section: Multiobjective Mathematical Programming (Mmp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to choose the best compromise solution among the obtained Pareto optimal solutions by the ε-constraint method, a fuzzy decision maker is proposed which can softly select the most preferred compromise solution among the Pareto solutions [29,[37][38][39][40][41][42].For this purpose, the fuzzy decision maker calculates a linear membership function for each objective function in each Pareto optimal solution, which measures the relative distance between the value of the objective function in the Pareto optimal solution from its values in the respective utopia and pseudo nadir points. The mathematical formulation of these membership functions for the MMP market clearing problem is as follows:…”
Section: A Fuzzy Decision Makermentioning
confidence: 99%