2013
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/4/1041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed integer programming improves comprehensibility and plan quality in inverse optimization of prostate HDR brachytherapy

Abstract: Current inverse treatment planning methods that optimize both catheter positions and dwell times in prostate HDR brachytherapy use surrogate linear or quadratic objective functions that have no direct interpretation in terms of dose-volume histogram (DVH) criteria, do not result in an optimum or have long solution times. We decrease the solution time of the existing linear and quadratic dose-based programming models (LP and QP, respectively) to allow optimizing over potential catheter positions using mixed int… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
108
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model is based on the linear penalty model and includes catheter placement by introducing a set of feasible catheter positions and assigning to each position a binary variable that describes if it is used or not. This model is very similar to those by Karabis et al 28 and Gorissen et al 21 . Most models for dwell time distribution optimization can be extended to include catheter positioning by adding binary variables in the way described in Section 3.3.4.…”
Section: Methods For Optimization Of the Catheter Positioningsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model is based on the linear penalty model and includes catheter placement by introducing a set of feasible catheter positions and assigning to each position a binary variable that describes if it is used or not. This model is very similar to those by Karabis et al 28 and Gorissen et al 21 . Most models for dwell time distribution optimization can be extended to include catheter positioning by adding binary variables in the way described in Section 3.3.4.…”
Section: Methods For Optimization Of the Catheter Positioningsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Also their results show that improved dose distributions are obtained when the catheter positioning is optimized. Gorissen et al 21 also include catheter positioning in their model in the same way as Karabis et al 28 . To enable for a standard optimization software to solve their model, they specify the constraints (3.4) as indicator constraints.…”
Section: Optimization Of Catheter Positioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study did not compare all existing methods. Recently developed methods like Inverse Planning by Integer Program (IPIP) (24), the method presented by Holm et al (22) and that of Gorissen et al (23), were not included. This choice was based on availability of and experience with the current restricted set of methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downside of such a method is that optimization becomes a trial-and-error process to find the optimal combination of weights and dose objectives because the effect of changing one parameter in the objective function on all other objectives is unknown. The correlation between DVH parameters that are used to evaluate a plan and the objective function is not always evident (22,23).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on prescribed dose levels for the target and OAR, the model penalizes deviations from these levels at each dose point. The model is easy to solve but the objective function value has been observed to correlate weakly with dosimetric indices (Gorissen et al 2013, Holm et al 2013b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%