2022
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2021.3094815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming for Energy-Efficient Container Handling: Formulation and Customized Genetic Algorithm

Abstract: Energy consumption is expected to be reduced while maintaining high productivity for container handling. This paper investigates a new energy-efficient scheduling problem of automated container terminals, in which quay cranes (QCs) and lift automated guided vehicles (AGVs) cooperate to handle inbound and outbound containers. In our scheduling problem, operation times and task sequences are both to be determined. The underlying optimization problem is mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP). To deal with it… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the computation offloading model constructed in Section 2, the proposed problem is a MINLP problem [27]. The main methods for solving MINLP problems are deterministic and stochastic methods.…”
Section: Computation Offloading Methods Based On Minimum Cost Maximum...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the computation offloading model constructed in Section 2, the proposed problem is a MINLP problem [27]. The main methods for solving MINLP problems are deterministic and stochastic methods.…”
Section: Computation Offloading Methods Based On Minimum Cost Maximum...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we propose the successive shortest path-based computation offloading (SSPCO) algorithm, as shown in Algorithm 1. SSPCO uses the shortest path fast algorithm to search for the shortest path with unit cost as weight from the source node, S, to the sink node, T. Specifically, the flow network, G, is first constructed based on the input set of on-board missions, GEO/LEO satellite processing capacity, channel bandwidth, and channel gain (line 1), and then the corresponding residual network, G R , is constructed based on G, and the flows and unit costs of the edges on G R are initialized (lines 2-7); the shortest augmenting path from the source node to the sink node is continuously searched for and augmented in residual network, G R , until there is no augmenting path, p, in G R (lines 8-18); finally, the MCMF is transformed into the offloading decision: if there is flow from the mission node to the U node, it is considered as the mission offloading failure, otherwise the offloading ratio can be calculated by the flow on the edges from the mission node to the GEO satellite node and the self node (lines [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Successive Shortest Path-based Computation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on HFSOM, an integrated scheduling mathematical model is built for QCs, AGVs, and YCs. Xin et al [29] describe the integrated operations of QCs and lift AGVs as a two-stage hybrid flow shop problem, aiming to optimize the makespan and energy consumption simultaneously.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He et al [31] formulated integrated berth allocation and QC assignment as a mixed-integer programming model in order to minimize the total handling energy consumption of all vessels by QCs. Xin et al [32] investigated the cooperative scheduling problem of QCs and lift-automated guided vehicles considering the energy efficiency. A customized GA with lexicographic and weighted-sum strategies was developed to solve the studied problem.…”
Section: Scheduling Considering Energy Consumption In Container Terminalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constraint (30) implies that one HQC can only unload one bay task at a time, and constraint (31) ensures that one bay task can only be unloaded by one HQC at a time. Constraint (32) specifies the ranges of decision variables.…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%