2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed integer multi-objective optimization of composite structures with frequency-dependent interleaved viscoelastic damping layers

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe optimal design of composite structures with frequency-dependent interleaved viscoelastic damping layers is addressed in this paper. The design objective of simultaneously maximizing structural modal damping and frequency and minimizing weight is considered. The design problem is formulated as a mixed integer multi-objective optimization problem and solved by evolutionary algorithm. A layerwise finite element model is used. The Pareto-optimal solutions are obtained for two applications. The r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…density ρ V c = 1600 kg/m 3 and Poisson coefficient ν c = 0.5 (consult [48] for the values of the not listed constants z k and ∆ k ). A zero displacement boundary condition is imposed on the left side of the domain and four cubic cells on the middle of the right side (heavy tip mass with a material density 100 times heavier than the viscoelastic material) are not subject to optimization (see Figures 4 and 5).…”
Section: D Viscoelastic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…density ρ V c = 1600 kg/m 3 and Poisson coefficient ν c = 0.5 (consult [48] for the values of the not listed constants z k and ∆ k ). A zero displacement boundary condition is imposed on the left side of the domain and four cubic cells on the middle of the right side (heavy tip mass with a material density 100 times heavier than the viscoelastic material) are not subject to optimization (see Figures 4 and 5).…”
Section: D Viscoelastic Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we observe that the ROCOF is affected by both up states and mostly by the second up state. This information could be helpful in determining alert criteria associated with the deterioration of the system under study and passive vibration damping devices could be used to attenuate the vibration levels [7].…”
Section: Real Data Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“… and áf(p)(X,α)ñ represents the average value of the objective function over the current population, g¯j (p) is the violation of the j th constraint averaged over the current population, f(p)(XS,αS) and gj (p)(XS,αS) are the objective and constraint values with respect to the optimal continuous values XS under a given configuration αS, and all of these values will be obtained by solving the second-level approximate problem, which will be detailed in the subsection “The second-level approximate problem to optimize continuous ply thicknesses”; φ = (10/9) 0 5 . is used to enforce the 4-ply contiguity constraint, 40 and n c is the number of same-orientation plies in excess of four contiguously same orientation layers; ɛ is a small fraction of the maximum constraint to be added in the objective to discriminate between multiple designs with...…”
Section: Optimization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The optimum design of the laminated composite structures may lead to maximization or minimization of some of their characteristic, such as maximizing strength/stiffness, minimizing mass/deflection, or multiple objectives. 25 Reduction of the structural mass is a critical factor for aerospace applications, whereas it is minor factor for other aspects, like marine applications. 6 When structures are exposed to severe vibration circumstances, a frequent goal of designing such vibrating structures is to avoid resonance caused by external excitations, and natural frequency maximization, especially the fundamental one 79 is of great importance in the design of composite laminates to decrease the risk of resonance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%