2012 American Control Conference (ACC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2012.6314752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-initiative strategies for real-time scheduling of multiple unmanned vehicles

Abstract: Abstract-Advances in autonomy have made it possible to invert the typical operator-to-unmanned vehicle ratio so that a single operator can now control multiple heterogeneous Unmanned Vehicles (UVs). Real-time scheduling and task assignment for multiple UVs in uncertain environments will require the computational ability of optimization algorithms combined with the judgment and adaptability of human supervisors through mixed-initiative systems. The goal of this paper is to analyze the interactions between opera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This retasking is associated with degraded performance and increased workload (Cummings et al, 2010;Clare, Maere, & Cummings, 2012) as well as increased training requirements, degraded situation awareness, and potentially accidents (Miller & Parasuraman, 2007). In human-agent teaming, mental model incongruency can produce situations where agents' decisions do not match team members' expectations, leading to unpredictable behavior and degraded trust (Chen & Barnes, 2014;Clare, Macbeth, & Cummings, 2012;Hancock, Billings, & Schaefer, 2011;Ososky, Schuster, Phillips, & Jentsch, 2013;Parasuraman & Riley, 1997).…”
Section: Mental Model Congruency and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This retasking is associated with degraded performance and increased workload (Cummings et al, 2010;Clare, Maere, & Cummings, 2012) as well as increased training requirements, degraded situation awareness, and potentially accidents (Miller & Parasuraman, 2007). In human-agent teaming, mental model incongruency can produce situations where agents' decisions do not match team members' expectations, leading to unpredictable behavior and degraded trust (Chen & Barnes, 2014;Clare, Macbeth, & Cummings, 2012;Hancock, Billings, & Schaefer, 2011;Ososky, Schuster, Phillips, & Jentsch, 2013;Parasuraman & Riley, 1997).…”
Section: Mental Model Congruency and Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all of the initiative is on the side of the user since all planning operations are triggered by the user. Clare et al [44] presented a mixed-initiative scheduling system, where a human guides a planner in a collaborative process to solve the scheduling problem of assigning task to UVs. The system allows the operator to influence the planning process by changing objective functions for the automated planner to use in evaluating mission plans.…”
Section: A Disjointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [42] Finzi et al [41] Loizou&Kumar [46] Chipalkatty et al [47] Bresina and Morris [43] Clare et al [44] Pereira & Sousa [45] Horiguchi and Sawaragi [48] Nielsen et al [22] Few et al [23] Hardin et al [50] Ali and Arkin [49] Manikonda et al [51] Bruemmer et al [28] Adam et al [11]…”
Section: Murphy Et Al [21]mentioning
confidence: 99%