2018
DOI: 10.3201/eid2406.180035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Leptospira Infections in a Diverse Reservoir Host Community, Madagascar, 2013–2015

Abstract: We identified mixed infections of pathogenic Leptospira in small mammals across a landscape-scale study area in Madagascar by using primers targeting different Leptospira spp. Using targeted primers increased prevalence estimates and evidence for transmission between endemic and invasive hosts. Future studies should assess rodentborne transmission of Leptospira to humans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
46
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Leptospira can colonise the bronchial epithelium of naturally-infected wild brown rats (Zilber et al 2016), we did not identify any pulmonary infection in the sampled rats. Moreover, although mixed pathogenic Leptospira infection was described in 2/18 R. norvegicus in Madagascar (Moseley et al 2018), our study revealed only single-species infections. Heavier rats (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Although Leptospira can colonise the bronchial epithelium of naturally-infected wild brown rats (Zilber et al 2016), we did not identify any pulmonary infection in the sampled rats. Moreover, although mixed pathogenic Leptospira infection was described in 2/18 R. norvegicus in Madagascar (Moseley et al 2018), our study revealed only single-species infections. Heavier rats (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…infections were detected using a diagnostic real-time PCR targeting 300bp of the lfb1 gene and incorporating melt curve analysis to identify infecting Leptospira species (10). As the standard lfb1 primers may underestimate the prevalence of L. borgpetersenii infections and L. interrogans-L. borgpetersenii mixed infections may occur (11), samples which initially tested negative, as well as samples (n=12) from Cape Town, eight of which had previously been identi ed as infected with L. interrogans (7), were retested using a L. borgpetersenii species-speci c forward primer (11). All real-time PCR assays were performed as previously described (7,11).…”
Section: Leptospira Detection and Prevalence Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the standard lfb1 primers may underestimate the prevalence of L. borgpetersenii infections and L. interrogans-L. borgpetersenii mixed infections may occur (11), samples which initially tested negative, as well as samples (n=12) from Cape Town, eight of which had previously been identi ed as infected with L. interrogans (7), were retested using a L. borgpetersenii species-speci c forward primer (11). All real-time PCR assays were performed as previously described (7,11). Prevalence estimates and logit con dence intervals were estimated using the binom package (https://cran.r-project.org/package=binom) and mapped using the ggmap package (https://cran.r-project.org/package=ggmap).…”
Section: Leptospira Detection and Prevalence Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another 'limitation' of the study is that the samples were tested using primers which could not detect mixed infections (Moseley et al, 2018), leading to a conclusion of presence of maximal one Leptospira species per infected animal, whilst the animal could potentially be infected with multiple Leptospira species. For future research, the primers for testing mixed infections should be tested and if they work as described, they should be used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%