2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-014-0835-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed equilibria in Tullock contests

Abstract: Any symmetric mixed-strategy equilibrium in a Tullock contest with intermediate values of the decisiveness parameter ("2 < R < ∞") has countably infinitely many mass points. All probability weight is concentrated on those mass points, which have the zero bid as their sole point of accumulation. With contestants randomizing over a non-convex set, there is a cost of being "halfhearted," which is absent from both the lottery contest and the all-pay auction. Numerical bid distributions are generally negatively ske… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the denominator of the ratio in equation 22does not vanish on S, which proves the claim. Hence, we may argue as in Ewerhart (2015a) to see that…”
Section: Appendix Proofsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In particular, the denominator of the ratio in equation 22does not vanish on S, which proves the claim. Hence, we may argue as in Ewerhart (2015a) to see that…”
Section: Appendix Proofsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, when impact functions are convex, a pure‐strategy equilibrium does not often exist. Although mixed‐strategy equilibria exist, they generally are not unique and their properties remain elusive in the literature (e.g., Ewerhart 2015, 2017). Second, the condition alludes to the usual production technology with nonincreasing marginal output.…”
Section: Setup and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The properties of the symmetric Nash equilibrium of the Tullock contest are fairly well-understood. See, e.g., Pérez-Castrillo and Verdier (1992), Baye et al (1994), and Ewerhart (2014). g(X i ) = X R i for R > 0, and by g(X i ) = 1 for R = 0.…”
Section: The Tullock Contestmentioning
confidence: 99%