2024
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed ensiling of drought‐impaired grass with agro‐industrial by‐products and silage additives improves the nutritive value and shapes the microbial community of silages

Theresa Gruber,
Katerina Fliegerová,
Georg Terler
et al.

Abstract: Droughts lead to reduced biomass production and unfavourable nutrient composition in grassland. As an alleviation, yet unexploited strategy, mixed ensiling of grass with agro‐industrial by‐products may improve the ensilability and nutritive value of drought‐impaired grassland. This study investigated first whether mixed ensiling of drought‐impaired grass with either sugar beet pulp (SBP), wheat gluten feed (WGF) or brewers' grains (BG) has a beneficial impact on chemical composition, fermentation characteristi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effects of chop length and maturity stage of forage on the quality of the resulting silage (Randby et al, 2024) builds upon earlier work by de Assis Pires et al (2023). Ways to improve the nutritive value of ensiled forages by adding additives (Gruber et al, 2024;Nikodinoska et al, 2024) also relates to earlier published work on this topic (e. g., Bernardi et al, 2019;Gonda et al, 2023;Huson et al, 2023;Macêdo et al, 2023;Menezes et al, 2023).…”
Section: Congress)mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Effects of chop length and maturity stage of forage on the quality of the resulting silage (Randby et al, 2024) builds upon earlier work by de Assis Pires et al (2023). Ways to improve the nutritive value of ensiled forages by adding additives (Gruber et al, 2024;Nikodinoska et al, 2024) also relates to earlier published work on this topic (e. g., Bernardi et al, 2019;Gonda et al, 2023;Huson et al, 2023;Macêdo et al, 2023;Menezes et al, 2023).…”
Section: Congress)mentioning
confidence: 87%