Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART Symposium on Principles of Database Systems 1991
DOI: 10.1145/113413.113431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-approach algorithms for transitive closure (extended abstract)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some cases, however, it is faster than other transitive closure algorithms. This is of interest since a conceivably small random sample of elements from each reachability set may be useful for some applications and, furthermore, an abundance of papers in the database literature are concerned with faster transitive closure algorithms for some families of graphs (e.g., Jakobsson gave faster algorithms for graphs with certain connectivity properties [13,14]; also see Dar [9] for an experimental comparison of the performance of different transitiveclosure algorithms).…”
Section: Further Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, however, it is faster than other transitive closure algorithms. This is of interest since a conceivably small random sample of elements from each reachability set may be useful for some applications and, furthermore, an abundance of papers in the database literature are concerned with faster transitive closure algorithms for some families of graphs (e.g., Jakobsson gave faster algorithms for graphs with certain connectivity properties [13,14]; also see Dar [9] for an experimental comparison of the performance of different transitiveclosure algorithms).…”
Section: Further Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been other improvements on the running time for the all-pairs shortest paths problem for some special case graphs [2,10,15,16,17,18,19,22,26], but they all have worst-case time O(nE). Karger, Koller, and Phillips [19] show that Ω(nE) is a lower bound for directed graphs on the running time of any algorithm which is "pathcomparison based," which is evidence that it is hard to improve exact algorithms with this approach.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previous algorithms compute tuples from different source vertices at the same time, whereas a more parsimonious usage of memory can be achieved by computing the paths that originate from one source vertex one at the time [15].…”
Section: B Non-linear Tc Rules and The Smart Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%